Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Fujifilm

XF10

Pocket APS-C compact with a fixed 28mm-equivalent f/2.8 lens and 24MP Bayer sensor.

$499

Launch price

Released Jul 2018

vs
Q3

Leica

Q3

Full-frame fixed 28mm f/1.7 premium compact for documentary and travel.

$5,995

Launch price

Released May 2023

Q3 is 4.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

XF10

Wins

7categories

Q3

LandscapePortrait

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

XF10 wins 1 categories·Q3 wins 4 categories
  • BQ3 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 12,800)
  • BQ3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 200)
  • BQ3 has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 15 fps)
  • BQ3 has higher Max video bit rate (150 Mbps vs 50 Mbps)
  • AXF10 has lower Weight (279 g vs 743 g)

Key specs at a glance

XF10Q3
Resolution24.2 MP60.3 MP
SensorAPS-CFull Frame
ISO max12,800100,000
Burst6 fps15 fps
4K15 fps60 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight279 g743 g
Battery330 shots350 shots

Size and weight, to scale

XF10

113 × 64 × 41 mm

279 g (0.62 lb / 9.84 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Q3 front view

Q3

130 × 80 × 92 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

XF10 is 18mm narrower, 16mm shorter, and 51mm thinner than Q3.

XF10 is 464 g lighter than Q3.

Depth (front-to-back): 41mm XF10 · 92mm Q3

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

XF10

113 × 64 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Q3 back view

Q3

130 × 80 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

XF10

113 × 41 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Q3 top view

Q3

130 × 92 mm

Sensor size, to scale

XF10

23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

369 mm² area

Q3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseXF10Q3
Portrait
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
2.5Limited
5.0Fair✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
2.5Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins
Landscape
1.5Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
1.0Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins
Vlogging
3.0Limited
3.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

XF10

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112.5, 64.4, 41

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    279 g vs 743 g — lower is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    6 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Q3

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130, 80, 92

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • ISO max (native)

    100,000 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 200 — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye, Animal

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    150 Mbps vs 50 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, ProRes

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

XF10

Pros

  • APS-C in a pocket body
  • 28mm-equivalent lens
  • Very light

Cons

  • No EVF
  • 4K limited to 15p
  • Simpler controls

Q3

Pros

  • 60MP full-frame
  • Summilux 28mm lens
  • Built like a tank
  • Unique aesthetic

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Very expensive
  • No interchangeable system

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the XF10 and Q3 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

XF10
Q3
Resolution
24.2 MP
60.3 MP2.5× more
Sensor type
APS-C Bayer CMOS
Full-frame BSI CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.7 mm
36 x 24 mm
AA filter
No
No
XF10
Q3
Aperture
f/2.8
f/1.7
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
28 mm
XF10
Q3
Processor
Fujifilm image processor
Maestro Series processor with L2 Technology
XF10
Q3
ISO min (native)
200
50−150 less
ISO max (native)
12,800
100,000+3 stops
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
100,000
XF10
Q3
Shutter type
Leaf Shutter + Electronic
Electronic + mechanical shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/2000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, XF10 or Q3?

Q3 scores 8.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for XF10 — 60.3MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the XF10 and Q3?

XF10 is 24.2 MP and Q3 is 60.3 MP, so the Q3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

How does stabilization compare between the XF10 and Q3?

XF10 does not have IBIS, while Q3 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the XF10 or the Q3?

XF10 reaches 6 fps electronic. Q3 reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the XF10 and Q3?

XF10 weighs 279 g and Q3 weighs 743 g, so the XF10 is 464 g lighter.

Do the XF10 and Q3 record 4K video?

XF10: 4K up to 15p. Q3: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the XF10 and Q3 weather sealed?

XF10: No. Q3: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 330 shots (CIPA) for the XF10 and 350 shots for the Q3, giving the Q3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

XF10 launched at $499 and Q3 at $5,995. The XF10 is $5,496 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way XF10 vs Q3 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Fujifilm and Leica press materials.