Fujifilm
XF10
Pocket APS-C compact with a fixed 28mm-equivalent f/2.8 lens and 24MP Bayer sensor.
$499
Released Jul 2018
Ricoh
GR IV
Latest GR with 25.74MP APS-C sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, 5-axis SR, 53GB internal memory, and pocket street-camera handling.
$1,499
Released Jan 2026
GR IV is 7.4 years newer.
Wins
XF10
Wins
GR IV
1 categories tied
Check current prices
Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:
As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
TL;DR — Key differences
- BGR IV has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 12,800)
- AXF10 has higher AF points / zones (425 vs 49)
- BGR IV has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 15 fps)
- BGR IV has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 200)
- AXF10 has higher Burst (mechanical) (6 fps vs 4 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
XF10
113 × 64 × 41 mm
279 g (0.62 lb / 9.84 oz)
GR IV
109 × 61 × 33 mm
262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)
XF10 is 3mm wider, 3mm taller, and 8mm thicker than GR IV.
XF10 is 17 g heavier than GR IV.
Depth (front-to-back): 41mm XF10 · 33mm GR IV
Sensor size, to scale
XF10
23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C
369 mm² area
GR IV
23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C
361 mm² area
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
XF10
Subject recognition
Adds Human
Codecs
Adds H.264
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 112.5, 64.4, 41
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
AF points / zones
425 vs 49 — higher is better
Burst (mechanical)
6 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
6 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better
Battery life (CIPA)
330 shots vs 250 shots — higher is better
Reasons to choose
GR IV
Subject recognition
Adds Face, Eye
Codecs
Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7
Card types
Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I
ISO max (native)
204,800 vs 12,800 — higher is better
4K max frame rate
60 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better
ISO min (native)
100 vs 200 — lower is better
In-body stabilization
Only GR IV supports it
Both cameras share
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Card slots — Both 1
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
XF10
Pros
- ✓APS-C in a pocket body
- ✓28mm-equivalent lens
- ✓Very light
Cons
- –No EVF
- –4K limited to 15p
- –Simpler controls
GR IV
Pros
- ✓25.74MP APS-C sensor
- ✓5-axis sensor-shift SR
- ✓53GB internal memory
- ✓Pocketable 28mm GR lens
Cons
- –Fixed lens
- –No built-in EVF
- –Full HD video only
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the XF10 and GR IV at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm XF10
Ricoh GR IV
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for vlogging, XF10 or GR IV?
GR IV scores 6.5/10 versus 3.0/10 for XF10 — 262g — easy to handhold for selfie video.
What's the resolution difference between the XF10 and GR IV?
XF10 is 24.2 MP and GR IV is 25.74 MP, so the GR IV captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the XF10 and GR IV have in-body image stabilization?
XF10 does not have IBIS, while gR IV has in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the XF10 or the GR IV?
XF10 reaches 6 fps electronic. GR IV reaches 4 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the XF10 and GR IV?
XF10 weighs 279 g and GR IV weighs 262 g, so the GR IV is 17 g lighter.
Do the XF10 and GR IV record 4K video?
XF10: 4K up to 15p. GR IV: 4K up to 60p.
Are the XF10 and GR IV weather sealed?
XF10: No. GR IV: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 330 shots (CIPA) for the XF10 and 250 shots for the GR IV, giving the XF10 the edge.
How much does each cost?
XF10 launched at $499 and GR IV at $1,499. The XF10 is $1,000 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.