Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Fujifilm

XF10

Pocket APS-C compact with a fixed 28mm-equivalent f/2.8 lens and 24MP Bayer sensor.

$499

Launch price

Released Jul 2018

vs
GR IVx

Ricoh

GR IVx

40mm-equivalent GR IV sibling with a newly designed 26.1mm f/2.8 lens, 25.74MP APS-C sensor, 5-axis SR, 4K video, 53GB internal storage, and pocket street-camera handling. Winter 2026 planned.

$1,499

Launch price

Released Dec 2026

GR IVx is 8.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

4categories

XF10

Wins

6categories

GR IVx

Portrait

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

XF10 wins 1 categories·GR IVx wins 4 categories
  • BGR IVx has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 12,800)
  • AXF10 has higher AF points / zones (425 vs 49)
  • BGR IVx has higher Max video bit rate (150 Mbps vs 50 Mbps)
  • BGR IVx has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 200)
  • BGR IVx has higher 4K max frame rate (30 fps vs 15 fps)

Key specs at a glance

XF10GR IVx
Resolution24.2 MP25.74 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max12,800204,800
Burst6 fps4 fps
4K15 fps30 fps
IBISNoYes
Weight279 g265 g
Battery330 shots250 shots

Size and weight, to scale

XF10

113 × 64 × 41 mm

279 g (0.62 lb / 9.84 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

GR IVx front view

GR IVx

109 × 61 × 33 mm

265 g (0.58 lb / 9.35 oz)

XF10 is 3mm wider, 3mm taller, and 8mm thicker than GR IVx.

XF10 is 14 g heavier than GR IVx.

Depth (front-to-back): 41mm XF10 · 33mm GR IVx

Sensor size, to scale

XF10

23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

369 mm² area

GR IVx

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseXF10GR IVx
Portrait
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
2.5Limited✓ wins
1.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
2.5Limited
4.0Fair✓ wins
Landscape
1.5Limited
2.5Limited✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair
5.5Fair
Wildlife
1.0Limited
1.0Limited
Vlogging
3.0Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

XF10

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112.5, 64.4, 41

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • AF points / zones

    425 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    6 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    6 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    330 shots vs 250 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

GR IVx

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 33.4

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    204,800 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    150 Mbps vs 50 Mbps — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    100 vs 200 — lower is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    30 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • 1080p max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

XF10

Pros

  • APS-C in a pocket body
  • 28mm-equivalent lens
  • Very light

Cons

  • No EVF
  • 4K limited to 15p
  • Simpler controls

GR IVx

Pros

  • New 26.1mm f/2.8 GR lens (40mm equiv.)
  • GR IV 25.74MP APS-C + 5-axis SR
  • 4K 30p/24p and 53GB built-in storage
  • Snap focus, 50/71mm crops, 2-stop ND
  • Pocketable 265g body

Cons

  • Price not yet announced (listed at GR IV $1,499)
  • Winter 2026 or later — still in development as of Aug 2026
  • No built-in EVF
  • Fixed 40mm-equiv. lens

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the XF10 and GR IVx at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

XF10
GR IVx
Resolution
24.2 MP
25.74 MP+6%
Sensor type
APS-C Bayer CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.7 mm
23.3 x 15.5 mm
AA filter
No
No
XF10
GR IVx
Aperture
f/2.8
F2.8-F16
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
40 mm
XF10
GR IVx
Processor
Fujifilm image processor
GR ENGINE 7
XF10
GR IVx
ISO min (native)
200
100−100 less
ISO max (native)
12,800
204,800+4 stops
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
204,800
XF10
GR IVx
Shutter type
Leaf Shutter + Electronic
Leaf shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for vlogging, XF10 or GR IVx?

GR IVx scores 5.5/10 versus 3.0/10 for XF10 — 265g — easy to handhold for selfie video.

What's the resolution difference between the XF10 and GR IVx?

XF10 is 24.2 MP and GR IVx is 25.74 MP, so the GR IVx captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the XF10 and GR IVx have in-body image stabilization?

XF10 does not have IBIS, while GR IVx has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the XF10 or the GR IVx?

XF10 reaches 6 fps electronic. GR IVx reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the XF10 and GR IVx?

XF10 weighs 279 g and GR IVx weighs 265 g, so the GR IVx is 14 g lighter.

Do the XF10 and GR IVx record 4K video?

XF10: 4K up to 15p. GR IVx: 4K up to 30p.

Are the XF10 and GR IVx weather sealed?

XF10: No. GR IVx: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 330 shots (CIPA) for the XF10 and 250 shots for the GR IVx, giving the XF10 the edge.

How much does each cost?

XF10 launched at $499 and GR IVx at $1,499. The XF10 is $1,000 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way XF10 vs GR IVx vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of Fujifilm and Ricoh press materials.