Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Q3

Leica

Q3

Full-frame fixed 28mm f/1.7 premium compact for documentary and travel.

$5,995

Launch price

Released May 2023

vs

Panasonic

Lumix FZ2500

1-inch bridge camera with 20x Leica zoom, built-in ND filter, and advanced 4K video tools.

$1,199

Launch price

Released Sep 2016

Q3 is 6.7 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

7categories

Q3

LandscapePortrait

Wins

3categories

Lumix FZ2500

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Q3 wins 3 categories·Lumix FZ2500 wins 2 categories
  • AQ3 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 12,800)
  • BLumix FZ2500 has higher Burst (electronic) (50 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AQ3 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 20.1 MP)
  • BLumix FZ2500 has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 4 fps)
  • AQ3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 125)

Key specs at a glance

Q3Lumix FZ2500
Resolution60.3 MP20.1 MP
SensorFull Frame13.2 x 8.8 mm
ISO max100,00012,800
Burst15 fps50 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight743 g966 g
Battery350 shots350 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Q3 front view

Q3

130 × 80 × 92 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Lumix FZ2500

138 × 102 × 135 mm

966 g (2.13 lb / 34.07 oz)

Q3 is 8mm narrower, 22mm shorter, and 43mm thinner than Lumix FZ2500.

Q3 is 223 g lighter than Lumix FZ2500.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm Q3 · 135mm Lumix FZ2500

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Q3 back view

Q3

130 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix FZ2500

138 × 102 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Q3 top view

Q3

130 × 92 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix FZ2500

138 × 135 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Q3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lumix FZ2500

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

7.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseQ3Lumix FZ2500
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
5.0Fair✓ wins
4.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.0Fair
Landscape
8.0Excellent✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
4.5Fair✓ wins
2.0Limited
Wildlife
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.0Fair
Vlogging
3.0Limited
5.0Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Q3

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130, 80, 92

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • ISO max (native)

    100,000 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 20.1 MP — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, ProRes

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 125 — lower is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix FZ2500

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 137.6, 101.9, 134.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV, MP4, AVCHD

  • Burst (electronic)

    50 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Microphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only Lumix FZ2500 supports it

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only Lumix FZ2500 supports it

  • Max video bit rate

    200 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Battery life (CIPA)Both 350 shots
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Q3

Pros

  • 60MP full-frame
  • Summilux 28mm lens
  • Built like a tank
  • Unique aesthetic

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Very expensive
  • No interchangeable system

Lumix FZ2500

Pros

  • 20x 26-520mm equivalent zoom
  • Built-in ND filter
  • Strong 4K video
  • Mic and headphone jacks

Cons

  • Large bridge body
  • 1-inch sensor
  • Older AF

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Q3 and Lumix FZ2500 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Q3
Lumix FZ2500
Resolution
60.3 MP3× more
20.1 MP
Sensor type
Full-frame BSI CMOS
1-inch High Sensitivity MOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
13.2 x 8.8 mm
AA filter
No
No
Q3
Lumix FZ2500
Aperture
f/1.7
f/2.8-4.5
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
26-520 mm
Q3
Lumix FZ2500
Processor
Maestro Series processor with L2 Technology
Venus Engine
Q3
Lumix FZ2500
ISO min (native)
50−75 less
125
ISO max (native)
100,000+3 stops
12,800
ISO max (expanded)
100,000
25,600
Q3
Lumix FZ2500
Shutter type
Electronic + mechanical shutter
Focal-plane mechanical + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/2000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, Q3 or Lumix FZ2500?

Q3 scores 8.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for Lumix FZ2500 — 60.3MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the Q3 and Lumix FZ2500?

Q3 is 60.3 MP and Lumix FZ2500 is 20.1 MP, so the Q3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

How does stabilization compare between the Q3 and Lumix FZ2500?

Q3 does not have IBIS, while Lumix FZ2500 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Q3 or the Lumix FZ2500?

Q3 reaches 15 fps electronic. Lumix FZ2500 reaches 50 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Q3 and Lumix FZ2500?

Q3 weighs 743 g and Lumix FZ2500 weighs 966 g, so the Q3 is 223 g lighter.

Do the Q3 and Lumix FZ2500 record 4K video?

Q3: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. Lumix FZ2500: 4K up to 30p.

Are the Q3 and Lumix FZ2500 weather sealed?

Q3: Yes. Lumix FZ2500: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the Q3 and 350 shots for the Lumix FZ2500, giving the Lumix FZ2500 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Q3 launched at $5,995 and Lumix FZ2500 at $1,199. The Lumix FZ2500 is $4,796 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Q3 vs Lumix FZ2500 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Leica and Panasonic press materials.