Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Q3

Leica

Q3

Full-frame fixed 28mm f/1.7 premium compact for documentary and travel.

$5,995

Launch price

Released May 2023

vs

Ricoh

GR II

Classic APS-C GR with 16.2MP sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, built-in flash, Wi-Fi, and snap-focus street ergonomics.

$799

Launch price

Released Jun 2015

Q3 is 7.9 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

Q3

LandscapePortrait

Wins

1categories

GR II

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Q3 wins 4 categories·GR II wins 1 categories
  • AQ3 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 25,600)
  • AQ3 has higher Burst (electronic) (15 fps vs 4 fps)
  • AQ3 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 16.2 MP)
  • BGR II has lower Weight (251 g vs 743 g)
  • AQ3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)

Key specs at a glance

Q3GR II
Resolution60.3 MP16.2 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max100,00025,600
Burst15 fps4 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight743 g251 g
Battery350 shots320 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Q3 front view

Q3

130 × 80 × 92 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

GR II

117 × 63 × 35 mm

251 g (0.55 lb / 8.85 oz)

Q3 is 13mm wider, 17mm taller, and 57mm thicker than GR II.

Q3 is 492 g heavier than GR II.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm Q3 · 35mm GR II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Q3 back view

Q3

130 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

GR II

117 × 63 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Q3 top view

Q3

130 × 92 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

GR II

117 × 35 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Q3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

GR II

23.7 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

372 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseQ3GR II
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Sports & Action
5.0Fair✓ wins
1.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair✓ wins
2.5Limited
Landscape
8.0Excellent✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
4.5Fair
4.5Fair
Wildlife
5.5Fair✓ wins
0.0Limited
Vlogging
3.0Limited
3.5Limited✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Q3

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264, ProRes

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130, 80, 92

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Eye, Animal

  • ISO max (native)

    100,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    15 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 16.2 MP — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

Reasons to choose

GR II

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 117, 62.8, 34.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC UHS-I

  • Weight

    251 g vs 743 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • Burst (mechanical)Both 4 fps
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Q3

Pros

  • 60MP full-frame
  • Summilux 28mm lens
  • Built like a tank
  • Unique aesthetic

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Very expensive
  • No interchangeable system

GR II

Pros

  • APS-C sensor
  • 28mm GR lens
  • Built-in flash
  • Great used value

Cons

  • Older 16MP sensor
  • No IBIS
  • Fixed lens

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Q3 and GR II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Q3
GR II
Resolution
60.3 MP3.7× more
16.2 MP
Sensor type
Full-frame BSI CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
23.7 x 15.7 mm
AA filter
No
No
Q3
GR II
Aperture
f/1.7
F2.8-F16
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
28 mm
Q3
GR II
Processor
Maestro Series processor with L2 Technology
GR ENGINE V
Q3
GR II
ISO min (native)
50−50 less
100
ISO max (native)
100,000+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
100,000
25,600
Q3
GR II
Shutter type
Electronic + mechanical shutter
Leaf shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/2000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, Q3 or GR II?

Q3 scores 8.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for GR II — 60.3MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the Q3 and GR II?

Q3 is 60.3 MP and GR II is 16.2 MP, so the Q3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

How does stabilization compare between the Q3 and GR II?

Q3 does not have IBIS, while GR II does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Q3 or the GR II?

Q3 reaches 15 fps electronic. GR II reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Q3 and GR II?

Q3 weighs 743 g and GR II weighs 251 g, so the GR II is 492 g lighter.

Do the Q3 and GR II record 4K video?

Q3: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. GR II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the Q3 and GR II weather sealed?

Q3: Yes. GR II: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the Q3 and 320 shots for the GR II, giving the Q3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Q3 launched at $5,995 and GR II at $799. The GR II is $5,196 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Q3 vs GR II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Leica and Ricoh press materials.