Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Zf

Nikon

Zf

Retro-styled 24.5MP full-frame mirrorless with classic dials, EXPEED 7 AF, 8-stop IBIS, and 4K 60p video.

$2,049

Launch price

Released Sep 2023

vs
Alpha 1 II

Sony

Alpha 1 II

50MP stacked flagship with 30fps RAW, 8K video, and Sony's fastest hybrid performance.

$6,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2024

Alpha 1 II is 1.2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

4categories

Zf

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

7categories

Alpha 1 II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Zf wins 1 categories·Alpha 1 II wins 4 categories
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 273)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 3,690,000)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher Resolution (50.1 MP vs 24.5 MP)
  • AZf has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 32,000)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

ZfAlpha 1 II
Resolution24.5 MP50.1 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max64,00032,000
Burst30 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop8.5-stop
Weight710 g743 g
Battery380 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Zf front view

Zf

144 × 103 × 49 mm

710 g (1.57 lb / 25.04 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 1 II front view

Alpha 1 II

136 × 97 × 83 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

Zf is 34mm thinner than Alpha 1 II but it is also 8mm wider and 6mm taller.

Zf is 33 g lighter than Alpha 1 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 49mm Zf · 83mm Alpha 1 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Zf back view

Zf

144 × 103 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 1 II

136 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Zf top view

Zf

144 × 49 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 1 II

136 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Zf

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Alpha 1 II

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Zf

Nikon Z

90+

native lenses available

40 first-party50 third-party

Alpha 1 II

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseZfAlpha 1 II
Portrait
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
9.5Excellent
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.0Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Zf

  • AF low-light limit

    -10 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Dogs…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265/HEVC 8-bit, H.265/HEVC 10-bit, H.264/AVC 8-bit

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 144, 103, 49

  • ISO max (native)

    64,000 vs 32,000 — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds MicroSD UHS-I

  • Burst (mechanical)

    14 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • Weight

    710 g vs 743 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 1 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.1, 96.9, 82.9

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 273 — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    50.1 MP vs 24.5 MP — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only Alpha 1 II supports it

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (electronic)Both 30 fps
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Zf

Pros

  • Beautiful retro design
  • 273-point hybrid AF
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulated touchscreen

Cons

  • No grip extension standard
  • Mixed SD + MicroSD card slots
  • 24.5MP only

Alpha 1 II

Pros

  • 50MP stacked sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free burst
  • 8K 30p video
  • Best Sony AF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Complex menus
  • Large files

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Zf and Alpha 1 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Zf
Alpha 1 II
Resolution
24.5 MP
50.1 MP2× more
Sensor type
Full Frame BSI-CMOS
Full Frame Stacked Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
Zf
Alpha 1 II
Processor
EXPEED 7
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
Zf
Alpha 1 II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
64,000+1 stop
32,000
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
Zf
Alpha 1 II
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, Zf or Alpha 1 II?

Alpha 1 II scores 9.5/10 versus 6.0/10 for Zf — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the Zf and Alpha 1 II?

Zf is 24.5 MP and Alpha 1 II is 50.1 MP, so the Alpha 1 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Zf and Alpha 1 II have in-body image stabilization?

Zf has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Zf or the Alpha 1 II?

Zf reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 1 II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Zf and Alpha 1 II?

Zf weighs 710 g and Alpha 1 II weighs 743 g, so the Zf is 33 g lighter.

Do the Zf and Alpha 1 II record 4K video?

Zf: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 1 II: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the Zf and Alpha 1 II weather sealed?

Zf: Yes. Alpha 1 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 380 shots (CIPA) for the Zf and 520 shots for the Alpha 1 II, giving the Alpha 1 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

Zf launched at $2,049 and Alpha 1 II at $6,499. The Zf is $4,450 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Zf vs Alpha 1 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Nikon and Sony press materials.