Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Nikon

Zf

Retro-styled 24.5MP full-frame mirrorless with classic dials, EXPEED 7 AF, 8-stop IBIS, and 4K 60p video.

$2,049

Released Sep 2023

Zf is 10 months newer.

Wins

4categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

5categories

Zf

PortraitSports & Action

5 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·Zf wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 273)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 380 shots)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 64,000)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 30 fps)
  • BZf has higher Burst (mechanical) (14 fps vs 12 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIZf
Resolution24.2 MP24.5 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40064,000
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop8-stop
Weight680 g630 g
Battery760 shots380 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

Zf

144 × 103 × 49 mm

630 g (1.39 lb / 22.22 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 6mm narrower and 5mm shorter than Zf but it is also 39mm thicker.

EOS R6 Mark II is 50 g heavier than Zf.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 49mm Zf

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Zf

144 × 103 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Zf

144 × 49 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Zf

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Zf

Nikon Z

90+

native lenses available

40 first-party50 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIZf
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.0Good
7.0Good
Travel
7.5Good
7.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 273 — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs 380 shots — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 64,000 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Horses, Motorbikes, Aircraft

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Zf

  • AF low-light limit

    -10 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265/HEVC 8-bit, H.265/HEVC 10-bit, H.264/AVC 8-bit

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 144, 103, 49

  • Card types

    Adds MicroSD UHS-I

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bicycles, Motorcycles, Airplanes

  • Burst (mechanical)

    14 fps vs 12 fps — higher is better

  • Weight

    630 g vs 680 g — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.8 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Zf

Pros

  • Beautiful retro design
  • 273-point hybrid AF
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulated touchscreen

Cons

  • No grip extension standard
  • Mixed SD + MicroSD card slots
  • 24.5MP only

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Zf
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.5 MP+1%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame BSI-CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
Zf
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Hybrid AF (phase-detect + contrast-detect)
AF points / zones
10533.9× more
273
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-10 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
People, Birds, Dogs, Cats, Cars, Bicycles, Motorcycles, Trains, Airplanes
EOS R6 Mark II
Zf
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
14 fps+17%
Burst (electronic)
40 fps+33%
30 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
180 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
Zf
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
N-Log / HLG
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.265/HEVC 8-bit, H.265/HEVC 10-bit, H.264/AVC 8-bit
EOS R6 Mark II
Zf
Weight
680 g
630 g−50 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
144 × 103 × 49 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R6 Mark II or Zf?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.5/10 versus 6.0/10 for Zf — 4K recording.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Zf?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Zf is 24.5 MP, so the Zf captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Zf have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while zf has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Zf?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Zf reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Zf?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and Zf weighs 630 g, so the Zf is 50 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Zf record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Zf: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Zf weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Zf: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 380 shots for the Zf, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Zf at $2,049. The Zf is $450 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Nikon press materials.