Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

OM System

OM-1 II

Flagship MFT with stacked sensor, 120fps, and pro wildlife features.

$2,399

Launch price

Released Feb 2024

vs
Lumix G9 II

Panasonic

Lumix G9 II

MFT hybrid with 8-stop IBIS and 75fps stills for wildlife on a budget.

$1,899

Launch price

Released Sep 2023

OM-1 II is 5 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

9categories

OM-1 II

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

6categories

Lumix G9 II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-1 II wins 2 categories·Lumix G9 II wins 3 categories
  • BLumix G9 II has higher Max video bit rate (800 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AOM-1 II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • BLumix G9 II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • BLumix G9 II has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
  • AOM-1 II has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 75 fps)

Key specs at a glance

OM-1 IILumix G9 II
Resolution20.4 MP25.2 MP
SensorMFTMFT
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst120 fps75 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS8.5-stop8-stop
Weight599 g658 g
Battery520 shots390 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-1 II

135 × 92 × 73 mm

599 g (1.32 lb / 21.13 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Lumix G9 II front view

Lumix G9 II

134 × 102 × 90 mm

658 g (1.45 lb / 23.21 oz)

OM-1 II is 11mm shorter and 17mm thinner than Lumix G9 II but it is also 1mm wider.

OM-1 II is 59 g lighter than Lumix G9 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 73mm OM-1 II · 90mm Lumix G9 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-1 II

135 × 92 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix G9 II back view

Lumix G9 II

134 × 102 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-1 II

135 × 73 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix G9 II top view

Lumix G9 II

134 × 90 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-1 II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Lumix G9 II

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-1 II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Lumix G9 II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-1 IILumix G9 II
Portrait
4.0Fair
6.0Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
2.5Limited
5.0Fair✓ wins
Travel
7.0Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
7.0Good✓ wins
Vlogging
7.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-1 II

  • AF low-light limit

    -8 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.8, 91.6, 72.7

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 75 fps — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,680,000 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV

Reasons to choose

Lumix G9 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.3, 102.3, 90.1

  • Max video bit rate

    800 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only Lumix G9 II supports it

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only Lumix G9 II supports it

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-1 II

Pros

  • 120fps stills
  • Stacked MFT
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Computational features

Cons

  • MFT sensor size
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Menu complexity

Lumix G9 II

Pros

  • 75fps stills mode
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Compact tele reach

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Video not GH-level

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-1 II and Lumix G9 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-1 II
Lumix G9 II
Resolution
20.4 MP
25.2 MP+24%
Sensor type
4/3 Stacked BSI Live MOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13.0 mm
17.3 x 13.0 mm
AA filter
No
No
OM-1 II
Lumix G9 II
Processor
TruePic X
Venus Engine
OM-1 II
Lumix G9 II
ISO min (native)
80−20 less
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
25,600
OM-1 II
Lumix G9 II
Shutter type
Computerised focal-plane shutter + electronic shutter
Focal-plane mechanical + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, OM-1 II or Lumix G9 II?

Lumix G9 II scores 9.5/10 versus 5.5/10 for OM-1 II — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-1 II and Lumix G9 II?

OM-1 II is 20.4 MP and Lumix G9 II is 25.2 MP, so the Lumix G9 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-1 II and Lumix G9 II have in-body image stabilization?

OM-1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Lumix G9 II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-1 II or the Lumix G9 II?

OM-1 II reaches 120 fps electronic. Lumix G9 II reaches 75 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-1 II and Lumix G9 II?

OM-1 II weighs 599 g and Lumix G9 II weighs 658 g, so the OM-1 II is 59 g lighter.

Do the OM-1 II and Lumix G9 II record 4K video?

OM-1 II: 4K up to 60p. Lumix G9 II: 5.8K Open Gate (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the OM-1 II and Lumix G9 II weather sealed?

OM-1 II: Yes. Lumix G9 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the OM-1 II and 390 shots for the Lumix G9 II, giving the OM-1 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-1 II launched at $2,399 and Lumix G9 II at $1,899. The Lumix G9 II is $500 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-1 II vs Lumix G9 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System and Panasonic press materials.