Panasonic
Lumix G9 II
MFT hybrid with 8-stop IBIS and 75fps stills for wildlife on a budget.
$1,899
Launch priceReleased Sep 2023
Sony
Alpha 7 V
33MP partially stacked Exmor RS hybrid with BIONZ XR2 AI, 30fps blackout-free burst, 7.5-stop IBIS, and 4K 60p oversampled from 7K.
$2,899
Launch priceReleased Dec 2025
Alpha 7 V is 2.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
Lumix G9 II
Wins
Alpha 7 V
5 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- ALumix G9 II has higher Burst (electronic) (75 fps vs 30 fps)
- ALumix G9 II has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 95 frames)
- BAlpha 7 V has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)
- BAlpha 7 V has higher Battery life (CIPA) (630 shots vs 390 shots)
- ALumix G9 II has higher Burst (mechanical) (14 fps vs 10 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
Lumix G9 II
134 × 102 × 90 mm
658 g (1.45 lb / 23.21 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
Alpha 7 V
130 × 96 × 82 mm
695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)
Lumix G9 II is 4mm wider, 6mm taller, and 8mm thicker than Alpha 7 V.
Lumix G9 II is 37 g lighter than Alpha 7 V.
Depth (front-to-back): 90mm Lumix G9 II · 82mm Alpha 7 V
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
Lumix G9 II
134 × 102 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Alpha 7 V
130 × 96 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
Lumix G9 II
134 × 90 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Alpha 7 V
130 × 82 mm
Sensor size, to scale
Lumix G9 II
17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds
225 mm² area
Alpha 7 V
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
Lumix G9 II
Micro Four Thirds
130+
native lenses available
Alpha 7 V
✓ more lensesSony E
350+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
Lumix G9 II
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 134.3, 102.3, 90.1
Burst (electronic)
75 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
200 frames vs 95 frames — higher is better
Subject recognition
Adds Face, Eye, Motorcycle
Codecs
Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ
Burst (mechanical)
14 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better
Max video bit rate
800 Mbps vs 600 Mbps — higher is better
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 7.5 stops — higher is better
Reasons to choose
Alpha 7 V
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 130.3, 96.4, 82.4
Codecs
Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I
Subject recognition
Adds Bird, Insect, Train…
AA filter
Only Alpha 7 V supports it
ISO max (native)
51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type A / SD UHS-II
Battery life (CIPA)
630 shots vs 390 shots — higher is better
Resolution
33 MP vs 25.2 MP — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 120 fps
- ✓Internal RAW video — Both support internal raw video
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
Lumix G9 II
Pros
- ✓75fps stills mode
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Compact tele reach
Cons
- –MFT sensor
- –Smaller ecosystem
- –Video not GH-level
Alpha 7 V
Pros
- ✓33MP partially stacked sensor — ~4.5× faster readout than α7 IV
- ✓Blackout-free 30 fps with full AF/AE (electronic shutter)
- ✓7.5-stop central / 6.5-stop peripheral IBIS (CIPA 2024)
- ✓759-point phase-detect AF down to EV -4 with AI subject recognition
- ✓7K oversampled 4K 60p (full-frame, no pixel binning) + 4K 120p
- ✓Pre-Capture and dual USB-C (10 Gbps + USB 2.0)
- ✓Up to 16 stops dynamic range
Cons
- –Premium price vs α7 IV
- –4K 120p typically requires APS-C / Super 35 crop
- –Heavier than α7 IV (695 g vs 659 g with battery)
- –Complex menu and feature set
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the Lumix G9 II and Alpha 7 V at major authorized retailers.
Panasonic Lumix G9 II
Sony Alpha 7 V
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for wildlife, Lumix G9 II or Alpha 7 V?
Alpha 7 V scores 10.0/10 versus 7.0/10 for Lumix G9 II — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.
What's the resolution difference between the Lumix G9 II and Alpha 7 V?
Lumix G9 II is 25.2 MP and Alpha 7 V is 33 MP, so the Alpha 7 V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the Lumix G9 II and Alpha 7 V have in-body image stabilization?
Lumix G9 II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the Lumix G9 II or the Alpha 7 V?
Lumix G9 II reaches 75 fps electronic. Alpha 7 V reaches 30 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the Lumix G9 II and Alpha 7 V?
Lumix G9 II weighs 658 g and Alpha 7 V weighs 695 g, so the Lumix G9 II is 37 g lighter.
Do the Lumix G9 II and Alpha 7 V record 4K video?
Lumix G9 II: 5.8K Open Gate (max), 4K up to 120p. Alpha 7 V: 4K up to 120p.
Are the Lumix G9 II and Alpha 7 V weather sealed?
Lumix G9 II: Yes. Alpha 7 V: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 390 shots (CIPA) for the Lumix G9 II and 630 shots for the Alpha 7 V, giving the Alpha 7 V the edge.
How much does each cost?
Lumix G9 II launched at $1,899 and Alpha 7 V at $2,899. The Lumix G9 II is $1,000 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Panasonic and Sony press materials.