Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Panasonic

Lumix G9 II

MFT hybrid with 8-stop IBIS and 75fps stills for wildlife on a budget.

$1,899

Released Sep 2023

Lumix G9 II is 10 months newer.

Wins

5categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

8categories

Lumix G9 II

Video & HybridSports & Action

5 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 2 categories·Lumix G9 II wins 3 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • BLumix G9 II has higher Max video bit rate (800 Mbps vs 340 Mbps)
  • BLumix G9 II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 390 shots)
  • BLumix G9 II has higher Burst (electronic) (75 fps vs 40 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IILumix G9 II
Resolution24.2 MP25.2 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps75 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop8-stop
Weight680 g658 g
Battery760 shots390 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

Lumix G9 II

134 × 102 × 90 mm

658 g (1.45 lb / 23.21 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 4mm shorter and 2mm thinner than Lumix G9 II but it is also 4mm wider.

EOS R6 Mark II is 22 g heavier than Lumix G9 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 90mm Lumix G9 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Lumix G9 II

134 × 102 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Lumix G9 II

134 × 90 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lumix G9 II

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Lumix G9 II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IILumix G9 II
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
7.0Good✓ wins
Vlogging
8.0Excellent
8.0Excellent

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs 390 shots — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 779 — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    3,690,000 vs 3,680,000 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix G9 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.3, 102.3, 90.1

  • Max video bit rate

    800 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    75 fps vs 40 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ

  • Burst (mechanical)

    14 fps vs 12 fps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 180 frames — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Lumix G9 II

Pros

  • 75fps stills mode
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Compact tele reach

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Video not GH-level

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix G9 II at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix G9 II
Resolution
24.2 MP
25.2 MP+4%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
17.3 x 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix G9 II
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Phase Hybrid AF with DFD technology
AF points / zones
1053+35%
779
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Face, Eye, Animal, Car, Motorcycle
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix G9 II
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
14 fps+17%
Burst (electronic)
40 fps
75 fps+88%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
180 frames
200 frames+11%
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix G9 II
Max resolution
4K UHD
5.8K Open Gate
4K max frame rate
60 fps
120 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps
800 Mbps2.4× more
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
V-Log / HLG
Codecs
H.265, H.264
Apple ProRes 422 HQ, H.265, H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix G9 II
Weight
680 g
658 g−22 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
134.3 × 102.3 × 90.1 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark II or Lumix G9 II?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 6.0/10 for Lumix G9 II — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix G9 II?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Lumix G9 II is 25.2 MP, so the Lumix G9 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix G9 II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while lumix G9 II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Lumix G9 II?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Lumix G9 II reaches 75 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix G9 II?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and Lumix G9 II weighs 658 g, so the Lumix G9 II is 22 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix G9 II record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Lumix G9 II: 5.8K Open Gate (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix G9 II weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Lumix G9 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 390 shots for the Lumix G9 II, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Lumix G9 II at $1,899. The Lumix G9 II is $600 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.