Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R1

Canon

EOS R1

Flagship 24.2MP full-frame BSI stacked RF body with 40fps burst, Dual Pixel Intelligent AF, 6K RAW, and 9.44M-dot EVF.

$6,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs
Lumix G9 II

Panasonic

Lumix G9 II

MFT hybrid with 8-stop IBIS and 75fps stills for wildlife on a budget.

$1,899

Launch price

Released Sep 2023

EOS R1 is 10 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

7categories

EOS R1

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

4categories

Lumix G9 II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R1 wins 3 categories·Lumix G9 II wins 2 categories
  • AEOS R1 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (1330 shots vs 390 shots)
  • AEOS R1 has higher EVF resolution (9,440,000 vs 3,680,000)
  • BLumix G9 II has higher Burst (electronic) (75 fps vs 40 fps)
  • BLumix G9 II has lower Weight (658 g vs 920 g)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R1Lumix G9 II
Resolution24.2 MP25.2 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps75 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8.5-stop8-stop
Weight920 g658 g
Battery1330 shots390 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R1 front view

EOS R1

158 × 150 × 87 mm

920 g (2.03 lb / 32.45 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Lumix G9 II front view

Lumix G9 II

134 × 102 × 90 mm

658 g (1.45 lb / 23.21 oz)

EOS R1 is 3mm thinner than Lumix G9 II but it is also 23mm wider and 47mm taller.

EOS R1 is 262 g heavier than Lumix G9 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R1 · 90mm Lumix G9 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R1 back view

EOS R1

158 × 150 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix G9 II back view

Lumix G9 II

134 × 102 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R1 top view

EOS R1

158 × 87 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix G9 II top view

Lumix G9 II

134 × 90 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R1

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lumix G9 II

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R1

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Lumix G9 II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R1Lumix G9 II
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
6.5Good
6.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
7.0Good✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R1

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 157.6, 149.5, 87.3

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, CFexpress Type B

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    1330 shots vs 390 shots — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,440,000 vs 3,680,000 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

Reasons to choose

Lumix G9 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.3, 102.3, 90.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • Burst (electronic)

    75 fps vs 40 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ

  • Weight

    658 g vs 920 g — lower is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    14 fps vs 12 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    25.2 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 120 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R1

Pros

  • 40fps electronic burst
  • 24.2MP BSI stacked full-frame sensor
  • Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
  • 6K RAW and 4K 120p video
  • Dual CFexpress Type B slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Very expensive
  • Large integrated-grip body

Lumix G9 II

Pros

  • 75fps stills mode
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Compact tele reach

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Video not GH-level

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R1 and Lumix G9 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R1
Lumix G9 II
Resolution
24.2 MP
25.2 MP+4%
Sensor type
Full Frame BSI Stacked CMOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
17.3 x 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R1
Lumix G9 II
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
Venus Engine
EOS R1
Lumix G9 II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
409,600
25,600
EOS R1
Lumix G9 II
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Focal-plane mechanical + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/64000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for vlogging, EOS R1 or Lumix G9 II?

Lumix G9 II scores 8.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for EOS R1 — Fully articulating screen — see yourself while filming.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R1 and Lumix G9 II?

EOS R1 is 24.2 MP and Lumix G9 II is 25.2 MP, so the Lumix G9 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R1 and Lumix G9 II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R1 has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Lumix G9 II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R1 or the Lumix G9 II?

EOS R1 reaches 40 fps electronic. Lumix G9 II reaches 75 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R1 and Lumix G9 II?

EOS R1 weighs 920 g and Lumix G9 II weighs 658 g, so the Lumix G9 II is 262 g lighter.

Do the EOS R1 and Lumix G9 II record 4K video?

EOS R1: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. Lumix G9 II: 5.8K Open Gate (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R1 and Lumix G9 II weather sealed?

EOS R1: Yes. Lumix G9 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 1,330 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R1 and 390 shots for the Lumix G9 II, giving the EOS R1 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R1 launched at $6,299 and Lumix G9 II at $1,899. The Lumix G9 II is $4,400 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R1 vs Lumix G9 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.