Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

OM System

OM-1 II

Flagship MFT with stacked sensor, 120fps, and pro wildlife features.

$2,399

Released Feb 2024

vs

Ricoh

GR Digital IV

Cult compact GR Digital with 10MP CCD sensor, fast 28mm equivalent f/1.9 lens, and sensor-shift stabilization.

$599

Released Sep 2011

OM-1 II is 12.4 years newer.

Wins

5categories

OM-1 II

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

1categories

GR Digital IV

4 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-1 II wins 4 categories·GR Digital IV wins 1 categories
  • AOM-1 II has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 1.54 fps)
  • AOM-1 II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 3,200)
  • AOM-1 II has higher Burst (mechanical) (10 fps vs 1.54 fps)
  • BGR Digital IV has lower Weight (219 g vs 599 g)
  • AOM-1 II has higher Resolution (20.4 MP vs 10 MP)

Key specs at a glance

OM-1 IIGR Digital IV
Resolution20.4 MP10 MP
SensorMFT1/1.7 inch
ISO max102,4003,200
Burst120 fps1.54 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stopYes
Weight599 g219 g
Battery520 shots390 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-1 II

135 × 92 × 73 mm

599 g (1.32 lb / 21.13 oz)

GR Digital IV

109 × 60 × 33 mm

219 g (0.48 lb / 7.73 oz)

OM-1 II is 26mm wider, 32mm taller, and 40mm thicker than GR Digital IV.

OM-1 II is 380 g heavier than GR Digital IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 73mm OM-1 II · 33mm GR Digital IV

Sensor size, to scale

OM-1 II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-1 II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

GR Digital IV: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-1 IIGR Digital IV
Portrait
4.0Fair✓ wins
2.0Limited
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
0.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
2.5Limited✓ wins
1.0Limited
Travel
7.0Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
5.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-1 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264, H.265, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.8, 91.6, 72.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-I

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 1.54 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 3,200 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    10 fps vs 1.54 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    20.4 MP vs 10 MP — higher is better

Reasons to choose

GR Digital IV

  • Codecs

    Adds Motion JPEG AVI

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 108.6, 59.8, 32.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, Eye-Fi

  • Weight

    219 g vs 599 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 80
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • Card slotsBoth 1

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-1 II

Pros

  • 120fps stills
  • Stacked MFT
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Computational features

Cons

  • MFT sensor size
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Menu complexity

GR Digital IV

Pros

  • Fast f/1.9 GR lens
  • CCD rendering
  • Compact classic
  • Sensor-shift stabilization

Cons

  • Small sensor
  • VGA video only
  • Very old model

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-1 II and GR Digital IV at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-1 II
GR Digital IV
Resolution
20.4 MP2× more
10 MP
Sensor type
4/3 Stacked BSI Live MOS
1/1.7" CCD
Sensor size
17.4 x 13.0 mm
1/1.7 inch
AA filter
No
OM-1 II
GR Digital IV
AF system
1053-point Cross Quad Pixel phase detection AF
Hybrid AF
AF points / zones
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-8 EV
Eye AF
Yes
No
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Birds, Animals, Motorsports, Airplanes, Trains
OM-1 II
GR Digital IV
Burst (mechanical)
10 fps6.5× more
1.54 fps
Burst (electronic)
120 fps77.9× more
1.54 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
OM-1 II
GR Digital IV
Max resolution
4K / C4K
VGA
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
OM-Log / HLG
Standard profiles
Codecs
H.264, H.265, MOV
Motion JPEG AVI
OM-1 II
GR Digital IV
Weight
599 g
219 g−380 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
134.8 × 91.6 × 72.7 mm
108.6 × 59.8 × 32.5 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, OM-1 II or GR Digital IV?

OM-1 II scores 8.5/10 versus 0.5/10 for GR Digital IV — 120fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-1 II and GR Digital IV?

OM-1 II is 20.4 MP and GR Digital IV is 10 MP, so the OM-1 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-1 II and GR Digital IV have in-body image stabilization?

OM-1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while gR Digital IV has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-1 II or the GR Digital IV?

OM-1 II reaches 120 fps electronic. GR Digital IV reaches 1.54 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-1 II and GR Digital IV?

OM-1 II weighs 599 g and GR Digital IV weighs 219 g, so the GR Digital IV is 380 g lighter.

Do the OM-1 II and GR Digital IV record 4K video?

OM-1 II: 4K up to 60p. GR Digital IV: 4K up to 60p.

Are the OM-1 II and GR Digital IV weather sealed?

OM-1 II: Yes. GR Digital IV: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the OM-1 II and 390 shots for the GR Digital IV, giving the OM-1 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-1 II launched at $2,399 and GR Digital IV at $599. The GR Digital IV is $1,800 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.