Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Z9

Nikon

Z9

Flagship stacked mirrorless with 45MP, 8K video, and no mechanical shutter.

$5,499

Launch price

Released Oct 2021

vs

OM System

OM-1 II

Flagship MFT with stacked sensor, 120fps, and pro wildlife features.

$2,399

Launch price

Released Feb 2024

OM-1 II is 2.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

7categories

Z9

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

7categories

OM-1 II

Sports & ActionTravel

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Z9 wins 2 categories·OM-1 II wins 3 categories
  • BOM-1 II has higher Burst (mechanical) (10 fps vs 0 fps)
  • BOM-1 II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AZ9 has higher Resolution (45.7 MP vs 20.4 MP)
  • BOM-1 II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 493)
  • AZ9 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

Z9OM-1 II
Resolution45.7 MP20.4 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max25,600102,400
Burst120 fps120 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS6-stop8.5-stop
Weight1160 g599 g
Battery740 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Z9 front view

Z9

149 × 150 × 91 mm

1160 g (2.56 lb / 40.92 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

OM-1 II

135 × 92 × 73 mm

599 g (1.32 lb / 21.13 oz)

Z9 is 14mm wider, 58mm taller, and 18mm thicker than OM-1 II.

Z9 is 561 g heavier than OM-1 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 91mm Z9 · 73mm OM-1 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Z9 back view

Z9

149 × 150 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-1 II

135 × 92 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Z9 top view

Z9

149 × 91 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-1 II

135 × 73 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Z9

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

OM-1 II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Z9

Nikon Z

90+

native lenses available

40 first-party50 third-party

OM-1 II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseZ9OM-1 II
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Landscape
9.5Excellent✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
5.5Fair
7.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Z9

  • Codecs

    Adds N-RAW, ProRes RAW HQ, ProRes 422 HQ…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 149, 149.5, 90.5

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B / XQD, CFexpress Type B / XQD

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Dogs, Cats, Cars…

  • Resolution

    45.7 MP vs 20.4 MP — higher is better

  • AF low-light limit

    -8.5 EV vs -8 EV — lower is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only Z9 supports it

Reasons to choose

OM-1 II

  • Burst (mechanical)

    10 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264, H.265, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.8, 91.6, 72.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 493 — higher is better

  • 1080p max frame rate

    240 fps vs 120 fps — higher is better

  • Weight

    599 g vs 1160 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (electronic)Both 120 fps
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Z9

Pros

  • 45MP stacked
  • 8K 60p internal
  • 120fps stills
  • Pro build

Cons

  • Heavy body
  • Expensive
  • Large files

OM-1 II

Pros

  • 120fps stills
  • Stacked MFT
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Computational features

Cons

  • MFT sensor size
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Menu complexity

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Z9 and OM-1 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Z9
OM-1 II
Resolution
45.7 MP2.2× more
20.4 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
4/3 Stacked BSI Live MOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
17.4 x 13.0 mm
AA filter
No
No
Z9
OM-1 II
Processor
EXPEED 7
TruePic X
Z9
OM-1 II
ISO min (native)
64−16 less
80
ISO max (native)
25,600
102,400+2 stops
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
Z9
OM-1 II
Shutter type
Electronic only
Computerised focal-plane shutter + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
N/A
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, Z9 or OM-1 II?

Z9 scores 9.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for OM-1 II — 45.7MP — excellent for prints up to 24×36".

What's the resolution difference between the Z9 and OM-1 II?

Z9 is 45.7 MP and OM-1 II is 20.4 MP, so the Z9 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Z9 and OM-1 II have in-body image stabilization?

Z9 has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while OM-1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Z9 or the OM-1 II?

Z9 reaches 120 fps electronic. OM-1 II reaches 120 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Z9 and OM-1 II?

Z9 weighs 1160 g and OM-1 II weighs 599 g, so the OM-1 II is 561 g lighter.

Do the Z9 and OM-1 II record 4K video?

Z9: 8K UHD (max), 4K up to 120p. OM-1 II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the Z9 and OM-1 II weather sealed?

Z9: Yes. OM-1 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 740 shots (CIPA) for the Z9 and 520 shots for the OM-1 II, giving the Z9 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Z9 launched at $5,499 and OM-1 II at $2,399. The OM-1 II is $3,100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Z9 vs OM-1 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Nikon and OM System press materials.