Ricoh
GR Digital IV
Cult compact GR Digital with 10MP CCD sensor, fast 28mm equivalent f/1.9 lens, and sensor-shift stabilization.
$599
Released Sep 2011
Ricoh
GR IV HDF
GR IV variant with built-in Highlight Diffusion Filter for softer rendering and the same 25.74MP APS-C pocket platform.
$1,599
Released Jan 2026
GR IV HDF is 14.3 years newer.
Wins
GR Digital IV
Wins
GR IV HDF
2 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- BGR IV HDF has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 3,200)
- BGR IV HDF has higher Burst (mechanical) (4 fps vs 1.54 fps)
- BGR IV HDF has higher Burst (electronic) (4 fps vs 1.54 fps)
- BGR IV HDF has higher Resolution (25.74 MP vs 10 MP)
- AGR Digital IV has higher Battery life (CIPA) (390 shots vs 250 shots)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
GR Digital IV
109 × 60 × 33 mm
219 g (0.48 lb / 7.73 oz)
GR IV HDF
109 × 61 × 33 mm
262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)
GR Digital IV is 1mm narrower and 1mm shorter than GR IV HDF.
GR Digital IV is 43 g lighter than GR IV HDF.
Depth (front-to-back): 33mm GR Digital IV · 33mm GR IV HDF
Sensor size, to scale
GR IV HDF
23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C
361 mm² area
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
GR Digital IV
Codecs
Adds Motion JPEG AVI
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 108.6, 59.8, 32.5
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, Eye-Fi
Battery life (CIPA)
390 shots vs 250 shots — higher is better
ISO min (native)
80 vs 100 — lower is better
Weight
219 g vs 262 g — lower is better
Reasons to choose
GR IV HDF
Subject recognition
Adds Face, Eye
Codecs
Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7
Card types
Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I
ISO max (native)
204,800 vs 3,200 — higher is better
Burst (mechanical)
4 fps vs 1.54 fps — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
4 fps vs 1.54 fps — higher is better
Resolution
25.74 MP vs 10 MP — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 60 fps
- ✓In-body stabilization — Both support in-body stabilization
- ✓Card slots — Both 1
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GR Digital IV
Pros
- ✓Fast f/1.9 GR lens
- ✓CCD rendering
- ✓Compact classic
- ✓Sensor-shift stabilization
Cons
- –Small sensor
- –VGA video only
- –Very old model
GR IV HDF
Pros
- ✓Built-in HDF effect
- ✓25.74MP APS-C sensor
- ✓5-axis SR
- ✓53GB internal memory
Cons
- –No ND filter
- –Fixed lens
- –Full HD video only
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for portraits, GR Digital IV or GR IV HDF?
GR IV HDF scores 6.5/10 versus 2.0/10 for GR Digital IV — 25.74MP — solid resolution.
What's the resolution difference between the GR Digital IV and GR IV HDF?
GR Digital IV is 10 MP and GR IV HDF is 25.74 MP, so the GR IV HDF captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the GR Digital IV and GR IV HDF have in-body image stabilization?
GR Digital IV has in-body image stabilization, while gR IV HDF has in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the GR Digital IV or the GR IV HDF?
GR Digital IV reaches 1.54 fps electronic. GR IV HDF reaches 4 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the GR Digital IV and GR IV HDF?
GR Digital IV weighs 219 g and GR IV HDF weighs 262 g, so the GR Digital IV is 43 g lighter.
Do the GR Digital IV and GR IV HDF record 4K video?
GR Digital IV: 4K up to 60p. GR IV HDF: 4K up to 60p.
Are the GR Digital IV and GR IV HDF weather sealed?
GR Digital IV: No. GR IV HDF: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 390 shots (CIPA) for the GR Digital IV and 250 shots for the GR IV HDF, giving the GR Digital IV the edge.
How much does each cost?
GR Digital IV launched at $599 and GR IV HDF at $1,599. The GR Digital IV is $1,000 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.