Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

OM System

OM-1 II

Flagship MFT with stacked sensor, 120fps, and pro wildlife features.

$2,399

Launch price

Released Feb 2024

vs

Ricoh

WG-1000

Entry rugged waterproof compact with 16.35MP sensor, 4x 27-108mm equivalent zoom, USB-C, and simple controls.

$229

Launch price

Released Jun 2024

WG-1000 is 4 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

OM-1 II

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

1categories

WG-1000

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-1 II wins 4 categories·WG-1000 wins 1 categories
  • AOM-1 II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 9)
  • AOM-1 II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 3,200)
  • AOM-1 II has higher 1080p max frame rate (240 fps vs 30 fps)
  • BWG-1000 has lower Weight (220 g vs 599 g)
  • AOM-1 II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (520 shots vs 300 shots)

Key specs at a glance

OM-1 IIWG-1000
Resolution20.4 MP16.35 MP
SensorMFT1/2.3 inch
ISO max102,4003,200
Burst120 fps
4K60 fps
IBIS8.5-stopNo
Weight599 g220 g
Battery520 shots300 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-1 II

135 × 92 × 73 mm

599 g (1.32 lb / 21.13 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

WG-1000

116 × 69 × 51 mm

220 g (0.49 lb / 7.76 oz)

OM-1 II is 19mm wider, 23mm taller, and 22mm thicker than WG-1000.

OM-1 II is 379 g heavier than WG-1000.

Depth (front-to-back): 73mm OM-1 II · 51mm WG-1000

Sensor size, to scale

OM-1 II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-1 II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

WG-1000: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-1 IIWG-1000
Portrait
4.0Fair✓ wins
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair✓ wins
1.0Limited
Landscape
2.5Limited✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
7.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
2.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-1 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.8, 91.6, 72.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-I

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 9 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 3,200 — higher is better

  • 1080p max frame rate

    240 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, MOV

  • Eye AF

    Only OM-1 II supports it

Reasons to choose

WG-1000

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Pet

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 116, 68.5, 50.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Weight

    220 g vs 599 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 1

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-1 II

Pros

  • 120fps stills
  • Stacked MFT
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Computational features

Cons

  • MFT sensor size
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Menu complexity

WG-1000

Pros

  • Waterproof and dustproof
  • USB-C
  • Affordable rugged camera
  • 4x optical zoom

Cons

  • Small sensor
  • Full HD only
  • Basic feature set

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-1 II and WG-1000 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-1 II
WG-1000
Resolution
20.4 MP+25%
16.35 MP
Sensor type
4/3 Stacked BSI Live MOS
1/2.3" CMOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13.0 mm
1/2.3 inch
AA filter
No
OM-1 II
WG-1000
Aperture
F3.0-F6.6
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
27-108 mm
OM-1 II
WG-1000
Processor
TruePic X
Image processor
OM-1 II
WG-1000
ISO min (native)
80−20 less
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+5 stops
3,200
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
3,200
OM-1 II
WG-1000
Shutter type
Computerised focal-plane shutter + electronic shutter
Mechanical + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, OM-1 II or WG-1000?

OM-1 II scores 10.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for WG-1000 — 120fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-1 II and WG-1000?

OM-1 II is 20.4 MP and WG-1000 is 16.35 MP, so the OM-1 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-1 II and WG-1000 have in-body image stabilization?

OM-1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while WG-1000 does not have IBIS.

What's the weight difference between the OM-1 II and WG-1000?

OM-1 II weighs 599 g and WG-1000 weighs 220 g, so the WG-1000 is 379 g lighter.

Do the OM-1 II and WG-1000 record 4K video?

OM-1 II: 4K up to 60p. WG-1000: Full HD.

Are the OM-1 II and WG-1000 weather sealed?

OM-1 II: Yes. WG-1000: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the OM-1 II and 300 shots for the WG-1000, giving the OM-1 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-1 II launched at $2,399 and WG-1000 at $229. The WG-1000 is $2,170 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-1 II vs WG-1000 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.