Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
OM-3

OM System

OM-3

Retro-styled MFT body with modern AF and creator-friendly design.

$1,699

Launch price

Released Jan 2025

vs

Sony

Alpha 9 III

Global shutter sports flagship with 120fps and zero rolling shutter for pro action.

$5,999

Launch price

Released Jan 2024

OM-3 is 1 year newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

8categories

OM-3

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

7categories

Alpha 9 III

Sports & ActionWildlife

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-3 wins 1 categories·Alpha 9 III wins 4 categories
  • AOM-3 has higher Burst (mechanical) (10 fps vs 0 fps)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 2,360,000)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 205 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 59.94 fps)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)

Key specs at a glance

OM-3Alpha 9 III
Resolution20.4 MP24.6 MP
SensorMFTFull Frame
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst120 fps120 fps
4K59.94 fps120 fps
IBIS6.5-stop8-stop
Weight413 g703 g
Battery640 shots400 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-3 front view

OM-3

139 × 89 × 46 mm

413 g (0.91 lb / 14.57 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 9 III

136 × 97 × 83 mm

703 g (1.55 lb / 24.80 oz)

OM-3 is 8mm shorter and 37mm thinner than Alpha 9 III but it is also 3mm wider.

OM-3 is 290 g lighter than Alpha 9 III.

Depth (front-to-back): 46mm OM-3 · 83mm Alpha 9 III

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-3 back view

OM-3

139 × 89 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 9 III

136 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-3 top view

OM-3

139 × 46 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 9 III

136 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-3

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Alpha 9 III

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

3.7× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-3

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Alpha 9 III

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-3Alpha 9 III
Portrait
4.0Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
2.5Limited
7.0Good✓ wins
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Wildlife
5.5Fair
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-3

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Burst (mechanical)

    10 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139.3, 88.9, 45.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • AF low-light limit

    -5.5 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV, MPEG-4 AVC

  • Weight

    413 g vs 703 g — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 400 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 9 III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.1, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SD UHS-II

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 205 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only Alpha 9 III supports it

Both cameras share

  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (electronic)Both 120 fps
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-3

Pros

  • Retro design
  • Modern AF
  • Compact

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Premium for MFT
  • Smaller lens selection

Alpha 9 III

Pros

  • Global shutter 120fps
  • Zero rolling shutter
  • Pro sports AF
  • Pre-capture buffer

Cons

  • 24.6MP only
  • Premium price
  • Battery drain at max speed

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-3 and Alpha 9 III at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-3
Alpha 9 III
Resolution
20.4 MP
24.6 MP+21%
Sensor type
BSI Stacked MOS
Full Frame Global Shutter Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13
35.6 × 23.8 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
OM-3
Alpha 9 III
Processor
TruePic X
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
OM-3
Alpha 9 III
ISO min (native)
200−50 less
250
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
51,200
OM-3
Alpha 9 III
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Global electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000
Max electronic speed
1/32000
1/80000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, OM-3 or Alpha 9 III?

Alpha 9 III scores 8.0/10 versus 3.5/10 for OM-3 — 4K recording.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-3 and Alpha 9 III?

OM-3 is 20.4 MP and Alpha 9 III is 24.6 MP, so the Alpha 9 III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-3 and Alpha 9 III have in-body image stabilization?

OM-3 has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 9 III has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-3 or the Alpha 9 III?

OM-3 reaches 120 fps electronic. Alpha 9 III reaches 120 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-3 and Alpha 9 III?

OM-3 weighs 413 g and Alpha 9 III weighs 703 g, so the OM-3 is 290 g lighter.

Do the OM-3 and Alpha 9 III record 4K video?

OM-3: 4K up to 59.94p. Alpha 9 III: 4K up to 120p.

Are the OM-3 and Alpha 9 III weather sealed?

OM-3: Yes. Alpha 9 III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the OM-3 and 400 shots for the Alpha 9 III, giving the OM-3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-3 launched at $1,699 and Alpha 9 III at $5,999. The OM-3 is $4,300 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-3 vs Alpha 9 III vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System and Sony press materials.