OM System
OM-5 Mark II
Compact IP53 Micro Four Thirds body with 20MP Live MOS sensor, 7.5-stop Sync IS, 30fps burst, 4K video, and USB-C charging.
$1,199
Launch priceReleased Jun 2025
Sony
Alpha 9 III
Global shutter sports flagship with 120fps and zero rolling shutter for pro action.
$5,999
Launch priceReleased Jan 2024
OM-5 Mark II is 1.4 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
OM-5 Mark II
Wins
Alpha 9 III
TL;DR — Key differences
- AOM-5 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (10 fps vs 0 fps)
- BAlpha 9 III has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 121)
- AOM-5 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
- BAlpha 9 III has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 30 fps)
- BAlpha 9 III has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
OM-5 Mark II
125 × 85 × 52 mm
417 g (0.92 lb / 14.71 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
Alpha 9 III
136 × 97 × 83 mm
703 g (1.55 lb / 24.80 oz)
OM-5 Mark II is 11mm narrower, 12mm shorter, and 31mm thinner than Alpha 9 III.
OM-5 Mark II is 286 g lighter than Alpha 9 III.
Depth (front-to-back): 52mm OM-5 Mark II · 83mm Alpha 9 III
Sensor size, to scale
OM-5 Mark II
17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type
226 mm² area
Alpha 9 III
35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame
847 mm² area
3.7× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
OM-5 Mark II
Micro Four Thirds
130+
native lenses available
Alpha 9 III
✓ more lensesSony E
350+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
OM-5 Mark II
AF low-light limit
-8 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Birds, Animals…
Burst (mechanical)
10 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 125.3, 85.2, 52
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better
ISO min (native)
80 vs 250 — lower is better
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Weight
417 g vs 703 g — lower is better
Reasons to choose
Alpha 9 III
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 136.1, 96.9, 82.9
AF points / zones
759 vs 121 — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better
4K max frame rate
120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better
Max video bit rate
600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
EVF resolution
9,437,184 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better
Codecs
Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I
Both cameras share
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓In-body stabilization — Both support in-body stabilization
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
OM-5 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Compact weather-sealed body
- ✓7.5-stop Sync IS
- ✓30fps burst
- ✓4K vertical video
Cons
- –20MP non-stacked sensor
- –Single card slot
- –Smaller EVF than OM-1
Alpha 9 III
Pros
- ✓Global shutter 120fps
- ✓Zero rolling shutter
- ✓Pro sports AF
- ✓Pre-capture buffer
Cons
- –24.6MP only
- –Premium price
- –Battery drain at max speed
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 9 III at major authorized retailers.
OM System OM-5 Mark II
Sony Alpha 9 III
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, OM-5 Mark II or Alpha 9 III?
Alpha 9 III scores 7.0/10 versus 2.5/10 for OM-5 Mark II — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.
What's the resolution difference between the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 9 III?
OM-5 Mark II is 20.4 MP and Alpha 9 III is 24.6 MP, so the Alpha 9 III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 9 III have in-body image stabilization?
OM-5 Mark II has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 9 III has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-5 Mark II or the Alpha 9 III?
OM-5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 9 III reaches 120 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 9 III?
OM-5 Mark II weighs 417 g and Alpha 9 III weighs 703 g, so the OM-5 Mark II is 286 g lighter.
Do the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 9 III record 4K video?
OM-5 Mark II: 4K up to 30p. Alpha 9 III: 4K up to 120p.
Are the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 9 III weather sealed?
OM-5 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 9 III: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the OM-5 Mark II and 400 shots for the Alpha 9 III, giving the OM-5 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
OM-5 Mark II launched at $1,199 and Alpha 9 III at $5,999. The OM-5 Mark II is $4,800 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.