Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Panasonic

AG-CX350

Broadcast 4K camcorder with 1-inch 15MP MOS sensor, 20x zoom, 10-bit ALL-Intra/HEVC, HLG, 3G-SDI, dual XLR, and NDI|HX option.

$5,995

Launch price

Released Sep 2019

vs

Sony

PXW-Z300

Flagship 3-CMOS XDCAM with 1/2-inch Exmor R sensors, 17x f/1.9 zoom, AI subject AF, 4K60p, flexible LCD arm, and content authentication.

$8,298

Launch price

Released Oct 2025

PXW-Z300 is 6.1 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

1categories

AG-CX350

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

2categories

PXW-Z300

Sports & ActionWildlife

15 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

AG-CX350 wins 1 categories·PXW-Z300 wins 2 categories
  • BPXW-Z300 has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 225)
  • AAG-CX350 has higher Resolution (15 MP vs 8.3 MP)
  • BPXW-Z300 has higher AF frame coverage (94 % vs 90 %)

Key specs at a glance

AG-CX350PXW-Z300
Resolution15 MP8.3 MP
SensorMFTMFT
ISO max51,20051,200
Burst30 fps30 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop8-stop
Weight580 g580 g
Battery520 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

AG-CX350

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PXW-Z300

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

AG-CX350 and PXW-Z300 share virtually identical body dimensions.

AG-CX350 and PXW-Z300 weigh the same.

Depth (front-to-back): 72mm AG-CX350 · 72mm PXW-Z300

Sensor size, to scale

AG-CX350

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

PXW-Z300

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseAG-CX350PXW-Z300
Portrait
4.0Fair
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent
9.5Excellent
Landscape
3.5Limited
3.5Limited
Travel
7.0Good
7.0Good
Wildlife
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Vlogging
7.0Good
7.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

AG-CX350

  • Resolution

    15 MP vs 8.3 MP — higher is better

Reasons to choose

PXW-Z300

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 225 — higher is better

  • AF frame coverage

    94 % vs 90 % — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 51,200
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 12 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

AG-CX350

Pros

  • 1-inch 15MP MOS (2000 TV lines)
  • 4K 10-bit ALL-Intra & HEVC LongG
  • 3G-SDI + dual XLR + genlock/timecode
  • Built-in ND + IR cut filter
  • HLG / V-Log L compatible workflow

Cons

  • Heavy at 1.9 kg body-only
  • Premium broadcast pricing
  • Fixed 20x lens
  • NDI requires optional license

PXW-Z300

Pros

  • 3× 1/2-inch 4K Exmor R 3CMOS
  • 17x f/1.9 constant aperture zoom
  • AI subject recognition + auto framing
  • 4K60p XAVC Intra/Long + MPEG HD422
  • Electronic variable ND + 12G-SDI

Cons

  • Premium flagship pricing
  • 3CMOS not single large sensor
  • Heavy at 2.6 kg body-only
  • New platform learning curve

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the AG-CX350 and PXW-Z300 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

AG-CX350
PXW-Z300
Resolution
15 MP+81%
8.3 MP
Sensor type
Four Thirds Live MOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
17.3 × 13.0 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
AG-CX350
PXW-Z300
Processor
Venus Engine
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
AG-CX350
PXW-Z300
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
AG-CX350
PXW-Z300
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, AG-CX350 or PXW-Z300?

AG-CX350 scores 10.0/10 versus 10.0/10 for PXW-Z300 — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the AG-CX350 and PXW-Z300?

AG-CX350 is 15 MP and PXW-Z300 is 8.3 MP, so the AG-CX350 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the AG-CX350 and PXW-Z300 have in-body image stabilization?

AG-CX350 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while PXW-Z300 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the AG-CX350 or the PXW-Z300?

AG-CX350 reaches 30 fps electronic. PXW-Z300 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the AG-CX350 and PXW-Z300?

Both bodies weigh roughly 580 g.

Do the AG-CX350 and PXW-Z300 record 4K video?

AG-CX350: 8K / 6K (max), 4K up to 120p. PXW-Z300: 8K / 6K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the AG-CX350 and PXW-Z300 weather sealed?

AG-CX350: Yes. PXW-Z300: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the AG-CX350 and 520 shots for the PXW-Z300, giving the PXW-Z300 the edge.

How much does each cost?

AG-CX350 launched at $5,995 and PXW-Z300 at $8,298. The AG-CX350 is $2,303 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way AG-CX350 vs PXW-Z300 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.