Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Panasonic

HC-X1200

Entry 4K60p camcorder with 1/2.5-inch MOS sensor, 24x 25–600mm zoom, face-detection AF, and compact run-and-gun design.

$1,299

Launch price

Released Mar 2021

vs

Sony

PXW-Z300

Flagship 3-CMOS XDCAM with 1/2-inch Exmor R sensors, 17x f/1.9 zoom, AI subject AF, 4K60p, flexible LCD arm, and content authentication.

$8,298

Launch price

Released Oct 2025

PXW-Z300 is 4.6 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

1categories

HC-X1200

Wins

12categories

PXW-Z300

Sports & ActionWildlife

5 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

HC-X1200 wins 0 categories·PXW-Z300 wins 5 categories
  • BPXW-Z300 has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BPXW-Z300 has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 225)
  • BPXW-Z300 has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 60 frames)
  • BPXW-Z300 has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
  • BPXW-Z300 has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 11 fps)

Key specs at a glance

HC-X1200PXW-Z300
Resolution8.29 MP8.3 MP
SensorMFTMFT
ISO max25,60051,200
Burst11 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBISNo8-stop
Weight580 g580 g
Battery640 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

HC-X1200

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PXW-Z300

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

HC-X1200 and PXW-Z300 share virtually identical body dimensions.

HC-X1200 and PXW-Z300 weigh the same.

Depth (front-to-back): 72mm HC-X1200 · 72mm PXW-Z300

Sensor size, to scale

HC-X1200

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

PXW-Z300

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseHC-X1200PXW-Z300
Portrait
3.0Limited
4.0Fair✓ wins
Sports & Action
4.0Fair
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
4.5Fair
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
0.0Limited
3.5Limited✓ wins
Travel
5.0Fair
7.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
5.0Fair
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

HC-X1200

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

PXW-Z300

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 225 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only PXW-Z300 supports it

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • WeightBoth 580 g
  • EVF magnificationBoth 0.78 ×
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

HC-X1200

Pros

  • 4K 60p at accessible price
  • 24x 25–600mm f/1.8–4.0 zoom
  • Face Detection AF/AE
  • 5-axis HYBRID O.I.S.+
  • USB-PD charging

Cons

  • No SDI output
  • 1/2.5-inch sensor
  • No pro XLR handle included
  • Entry-level codec options

PXW-Z300

Pros

  • 3× 1/2-inch 4K Exmor R 3CMOS
  • 17x f/1.9 constant aperture zoom
  • AI subject recognition + auto framing
  • 4K60p XAVC Intra/Long + MPEG HD422
  • Electronic variable ND + 12G-SDI

Cons

  • Premium flagship pricing
  • 3CMOS not single large sensor
  • Heavy at 2.6 kg body-only
  • New platform learning curve

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the HC-X1200 and PXW-Z300 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

HC-X1200
PXW-Z300
Resolution
8.29 MP
8.3 MP
Sensor type
Four Thirds Live MOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
17.3 × 13.0 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
HC-X1200
PXW-Z300
Processor
Venus Engine
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
HC-X1200
PXW-Z300
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
51,200+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
HC-X1200
PXW-Z300
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, HC-X1200 or PXW-Z300?

PXW-Z300 scores 10.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for HC-X1200 — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the HC-X1200 and PXW-Z300?

HC-X1200 is 8.29 MP and PXW-Z300 is 8.3 MP, so the PXW-Z300 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the HC-X1200 and PXW-Z300 have in-body image stabilization?

HC-X1200 does not have IBIS, while PXW-Z300 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the HC-X1200 or the PXW-Z300?

HC-X1200 reaches 11 fps electronic. PXW-Z300 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the HC-X1200 and PXW-Z300?

Both bodies weigh roughly 580 g.

Do the HC-X1200 and PXW-Z300 record 4K video?

HC-X1200: 4K up to 60p. PXW-Z300: 8K / 6K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the HC-X1200 and PXW-Z300 weather sealed?

HC-X1200: No. PXW-Z300: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the HC-X1200 and 520 shots for the PXW-Z300, giving the HC-X1200 the edge.

How much does each cost?

HC-X1200 launched at $1,299 and PXW-Z300 at $8,298. The HC-X1200 is $6,999 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way HC-X1200 vs PXW-Z300 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.