Panasonic
Lumix FZ2500
1-inch bridge camera with 20x Leica zoom, built-in ND filter, and advanced 4K video tools.
$1,199
Released Sep 2016
Ricoh
GR IV
Latest GR with 25.74MP APS-C sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, 5-axis SR, 53GB internal memory, and pocket street-camera handling.
$1,499
Released Jan 2026
GR IV is 9.3 years newer.
Wins
Lumix FZ2500
Wins
GR IV
2 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- BGR IV has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 12,800)
- ALumix FZ2500 has higher Burst (electronic) (50 fps vs 4 fps)
- BGR IV has lower Weight (262 g vs 966 g)
- ALumix FZ2500 has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 4 fps)
- BGR IV has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
Lumix FZ2500
138 × 102 × 135 mm
966 g (2.13 lb / 34.07 oz)
GR IV
109 × 61 × 33 mm
262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)
Lumix FZ2500 is 28mm wider, 41mm taller, and 102mm thicker than GR IV.
Lumix FZ2500 is 704 g heavier than GR IV.
Depth (front-to-back): 135mm Lumix FZ2500 · 33mm GR IV
Sensor size, to scale
Lumix FZ2500
13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch
116 mm² area
GR IV
23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C
361 mm² area
3.1× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
Lumix FZ2500
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 137.6, 101.9, 134.7
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Burst (electronic)
50 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better
Codecs
Adds H.264, MP4, AVCHD
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better
Animal / bird AF
Only Lumix FZ2500 supports it
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal
Microphone jack (3.5mm)
Only Lumix FZ2500 supports it
Reasons to choose
GR IV
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7
Card types
Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I
ISO max (native)
204,800 vs 12,800 — higher is better
Weight
262 g vs 966 g — lower is better
4K max frame rate
60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better
Codecs
Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264
In-body stabilization
Only GR IV supports it
Bluetooth
Only GR IV supports it
Both cameras share
- ✓AF points / zones — Both 49
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Card slots — Both 1
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
Lumix FZ2500
Pros
- ✓20x 26-520mm equivalent zoom
- ✓Built-in ND filter
- ✓Strong 4K video
- ✓Mic and headphone jacks
Cons
- –Large bridge body
- –1-inch sensor
- –Older AF
GR IV
Pros
- ✓25.74MP APS-C sensor
- ✓5-axis sensor-shift SR
- ✓53GB internal memory
- ✓Pocketable 28mm GR lens
Cons
- –Fixed lens
- –No built-in EVF
- –Full HD video only
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for travel, Lumix FZ2500 or GR IV?
GR IV scores 5.5/10 versus 2.0/10 for Lumix FZ2500 — 262g — ultralight for all-day carry.
What's the resolution difference between the Lumix FZ2500 and GR IV?
Lumix FZ2500 is 20.1 MP and GR IV is 25.74 MP, so the GR IV captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the Lumix FZ2500 and GR IV have in-body image stabilization?
Lumix FZ2500 does not have IBIS, while gR IV has in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the Lumix FZ2500 or the GR IV?
Lumix FZ2500 reaches 50 fps electronic. GR IV reaches 4 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the Lumix FZ2500 and GR IV?
Lumix FZ2500 weighs 966 g and GR IV weighs 262 g, so the GR IV is 704 g lighter.
Do the Lumix FZ2500 and GR IV record 4K video?
Lumix FZ2500: 4K up to 30p. GR IV: 4K up to 60p.
Are the Lumix FZ2500 and GR IV weather sealed?
Lumix FZ2500: No. GR IV: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the Lumix FZ2500 and 250 shots for the GR IV, giving the Lumix FZ2500 the edge.
How much does each cost?
Lumix FZ2500 launched at $1,199 and GR IV at $1,499. The Lumix FZ2500 is $300 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.