Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Ricoh

GR Digital IV

Cult compact GR Digital with 10MP CCD sensor, fast 28mm equivalent f/1.9 lens, and sensor-shift stabilization.

$599

Released Sep 2011

vs

Ricoh

GR III

Street photography icon with 24.24MP APS-C, 28mm equivalent GR lens, 3-axis SR, and snap-focus in a pocket body.

$899

Released Mar 2019

GR III is 7.5 years newer.

Wins

3categories

GR Digital IV

Wins

4categories

GR III

PortraitVlogging

2 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

GR Digital IV wins 1 categories·GR III wins 4 categories
  • BGR III has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 3,200)
  • BGR III has higher Burst (mechanical) (4 fps vs 1.54 fps)
  • BGR III has higher Burst (electronic) (4 fps vs 1.54 fps)
  • BGR III has higher Resolution (24.24 MP vs 10 MP)
  • AGR Digital IV has higher Battery life (CIPA) (390 shots vs 200 shots)

Key specs at a glance

GR Digital IVGR III
Resolution10 MP24.24 MP
Sensor1/1.7 inchAPS-C
ISO max3,200102,400
Burst1.54 fps4 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBISYesYes
Weight219 g257 g
Battery390 shots200 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GR Digital IV

109 × 60 × 33 mm

219 g (0.48 lb / 7.73 oz)

GR III

109 × 62 × 33 mm

257 g (0.57 lb / 9.07 oz)

GR Digital IV is 1mm narrower, 2mm shorter, and 1mm thinner than GR III.

GR Digital IV is 38 g lighter than GR III.

Depth (front-to-back): 33mm GR Digital IV · 33mm GR III

Sensor size, to scale

GR III

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGR Digital IVGR III
Portrait
2.0Limited
6.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
0.5Limited
0.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
3.5Limited
Landscape
1.0Limited
2.5Limited✓ wins
Travel
5.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins
Wildlife
0.0Limited
2.0Limited✓ wins
Vlogging
5.0Fair
6.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GR Digital IV

  • Codecs

    Adds Motion JPEG AVI

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 108.6, 59.8, 32.5

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    390 shots vs 200 shots — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds Eye-Fi

  • ISO min (native)

    80 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Weight

    219 g vs 257 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

GR III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.9, 33.2

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 3,200 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    4 fps vs 1.54 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    4 fps vs 1.54 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    24.24 MP vs 10 MP — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only GR III supports it

Both cameras share

  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • Card slotsBoth 1

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GR Digital IV

Pros

  • Fast f/1.9 GR lens
  • CCD rendering
  • Compact classic
  • Sensor-shift stabilization

Cons

  • Small sensor
  • VGA video only
  • Very old model

GR III

Pros

  • Pocketable APS-C
  • 28mm equivalent GR lens
  • 3-axis sensor-shift SR
  • Snap focus street shooting

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No built-in EVF
  • Full HD video only

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GR Digital IV and GR III at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

GR Digital IV
GR III
Resolution
10 MP
24.24 MP2.4× more
Sensor type
1/1.7" CCD
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
1/1.7 inch
23.5 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
No
GR Digital IV
GR III
AF system
Hybrid AF
Hybrid AF (image-plane phase detection + contrast detection)
AF points / zones
49
Eye AF
No
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
No
Subject recognition
Face, Eye
GR Digital IV
GR III
Burst (mechanical)
1.54 fps
4 fps2.6× more
Burst (electronic)
1.54 fps
4 fps2.6× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
No
GR Digital IV
GR III
Max resolution
VGA
Full HD
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
Standard profiles
Standard profiles
Codecs
Motion JPEG AVI
MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
GR Digital IV
GR III
Weight
219 g−38 g less
257 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
108.6 × 59.8 × 32.5 mm
109.4 × 61.9 × 33.2 mm
Weather sealing
No
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, GR Digital IV or GR III?

GR III scores 6.5/10 versus 2.0/10 for GR Digital IV — 24.24MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the GR Digital IV and GR III?

GR Digital IV is 10 MP and GR III is 24.24 MP, so the GR III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GR Digital IV and GR III have in-body image stabilization?

GR Digital IV has in-body image stabilization, while gR III has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GR Digital IV or the GR III?

GR Digital IV reaches 1.54 fps electronic. GR III reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GR Digital IV and GR III?

GR Digital IV weighs 219 g and GR III weighs 257 g, so the GR Digital IV is 38 g lighter.

Do the GR Digital IV and GR III record 4K video?

GR Digital IV: 4K up to 60p. GR III: 4K up to 60p.

Are the GR Digital IV and GR III weather sealed?

GR Digital IV: No. GR III: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 390 shots (CIPA) for the GR Digital IV and 200 shots for the GR III, giving the GR Digital IV the edge.

How much does each cost?

GR Digital IV launched at $599 and GR III at $899. The GR Digital IV is $300 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.