Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Ricoh

GR IV Monochrome

Monochrome-only GR IV with 25.74MP APS-C sensor, red filter mode, 5-axis SR, and classic 28mm pocket street-camera design.

$1,699

Released Jan 2026

vs

Ricoh

WG-8

Rugged waterproof compact with 20MP 1/2.3-inch sensor, 5x 28-140mm equivalent zoom, 4K video, GPS, and macro lights.

$399

Released Jul 2024

GR IV Monochrome is 1.5 years newer.

Wins

4categories

GR IV Monochrome

PortraitVlogging

Wins

3categories

WG-8

1 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

GR IV Monochrome wins 4 categories·WG-8 wins 1 categories
  • AGR IV Monochrome has higher ISO max (native) (409,600 vs 6,400)
  • AGR IV Monochrome has higher AF points / zones (49 vs 9)
  • AGR IV Monochrome has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)
  • BWG-8 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (340 shots vs 250 shots)
  • AGR IV Monochrome has higher Resolution (25.74 MP vs 20 MP)

Key specs at a glance

GR IV MonochromeWG-8
Resolution25.74 MP20 MP
SensorAPS-C1/2.3 inch
ISO max409,6006,400
Burst4 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBISYesNo
Weight262 g242 g
Battery250 shots340 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GR IV Monochrome

109 × 61 × 33 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

WG-8

118 × 66 × 33 mm

242 g (0.53 lb / 8.54 oz)

GR IV Monochrome is 9mm narrower and 4mm shorter than WG-8.

GR IV Monochrome is 20 g heavier than WG-8.

Depth (front-to-back): 33mm GR IV Monochrome · 33mm WG-8

Sensor size, to scale

GR IV Monochrome

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGR IV MonochromeWG-8
Portrait
6.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
0.5Limited
1.5Limited✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited✓ wins
3.0Limited
Landscape
2.5Limited✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
5.5Fair
5.5Fair
Wildlife
1.0Limited
1.5Limited✓ wins
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
3.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GR IV Monochrome

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    409,600 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    49 vs 9 — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only GR IV Monochrome supports it

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Eye

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

WG-8

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 118.2, 65.5, 33.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Pet

  • Weather sealing

    Only WG-8 supports it

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    340 shots vs 250 shots — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    125 vs 160 — lower is better

  • Weight

    242 g vs 262 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • Card slotsBoth 1

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GR IV Monochrome

Pros

  • Monochrome APS-C sensor
  • ISO 160-409600
  • 5-axis SR
  • Red filter mode

Cons

  • Black-and-white only
  • Fixed lens
  • Full HD video only

WG-8

Pros

  • Waterproof and dustproof
  • 4K video
  • GPS and compass
  • Macro stand included

Cons

  • Small sensor
  • Limited manual control
  • No RAW focus

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GR IV Monochrome and WG-8 at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

GR IV Monochrome
WG-8
Resolution
25.74 MP+29%
20 MP
Sensor type
APS-C Monochrome CMOS
1/2.3" CMOS
Sensor size
23.3 x 15.5 mm
1/2.3 inch
AA filter
No
GR IV Monochrome
WG-8
AF system
Hybrid AF (image-plane phase detection + contrast detection)
9-point AF / spot AF / auto tracking AF
AF points / zones
495.4× more
9
Eye AF
Yes
No
Animal / bird AF
No
No
Subject recognition
Face, Eye
Face, Pet
GR IV Monochrome
WG-8
Burst (mechanical)
4 fps
Burst (electronic)
4 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
No
GR IV Monochrome
WG-8
Max resolution
Full HD
4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps2× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
Standard profiles
Standard profiles
Codecs
MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
H.264
GR IV Monochrome
WG-8
Weight
262 g
242 g−20 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
109.4 × 61.1 × 32.7 mm
118.2 × 65.5 × 33.1 mm
Weather sealing
No
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, GR IV Monochrome or WG-8?

GR IV Monochrome scores 6.5/10 versus 1.0/10 for WG-8 — 25.74MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the GR IV Monochrome and WG-8?

GR IV Monochrome is 25.74 MP and WG-8 is 20 MP, so the GR IV Monochrome captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GR IV Monochrome and WG-8 have in-body image stabilization?

GR IV Monochrome has in-body image stabilization, while wG-8 does not have IBIS.

What's the weight difference between the GR IV Monochrome and WG-8?

GR IV Monochrome weighs 262 g and WG-8 weighs 242 g, so the WG-8 is 20 g lighter.

Do the GR IV Monochrome and WG-8 record 4K video?

GR IV Monochrome: 4K up to 60p. WG-8: 4K up to 30p.

Are the GR IV Monochrome and WG-8 weather sealed?

GR IV Monochrome: No. WG-8: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 250 shots (CIPA) for the GR IV Monochrome and 340 shots for the WG-8, giving the WG-8 the edge.

How much does each cost?

GR IV Monochrome launched at $1,699 and WG-8 at $399. The WG-8 is $1,300 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.