Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
fp L

Sigma

fp L

World's smallest full-frame interchangeable camera with 61MP and L-mount.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Jul 2021

vs

Sigma

sd Quattro H

Foveon sensor APS-H body with unique color rendering for stills purists.

$1,299

Launch price

Released Mar 2016

fp L is 5.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

fp L

WildlifePortrait

Wins

5categories

sd Quattro H

WildlifePortrait

11 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

fp L wins 0 categories·sd Quattro H wins 5 categories
  • Bsd Quattro H has higher RAW buffer depth (60 frames vs 12 frames)
  • Bsd Quattro H has higher Battery life (CIPA) (640 shots vs 240 shots)
  • Bsd Quattro H has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 29.97 fps)
  • Bsd Quattro H has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
  • Bsd Quattro H has higher Burst (electronic) (15 fps vs 10 fps)

Key specs at a glance

fp Lsd Quattro H
Resolution61 MP44.8 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst10 fps15 fps
4K29.97 fps60 fps
IBISNo6-stop
Weight427 g520 g
Battery240 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

fp L front view

fp L

113 × 70 × 45 mm

427 g (0.94 lb / 15.06 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

sd Quattro H

138 × 98 × 88 mm

520 g (1.15 lb / 18.34 oz)

fp L is 25mm narrower, 28mm shorter, and 43mm thinner than sd Quattro H.

fp L is 93 g lighter than sd Quattro H.

Depth (front-to-back): 45mm fp L · 88mm sd Quattro H

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

fp L back view

fp L

113 × 70 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

sd Quattro H

138 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

fp L top view

fp L

113 × 45 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

sd Quattro H

138 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

fp L

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

sd Quattro H

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use casefp Lsd Quattro H
Portrait
7.5Good
7.5Good
Sports & Action
6.5Good
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
6.0Good✓ wins
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Travel
5.0Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
8.0Excellent
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
4.5Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

fp L

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112.6, 69.9, 45.3

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Codecs

    Adds CinemaDNG, MOV

  • AA filter

    Only fp L supports it

  • Internal RAW video

    Only fp L supports it

  • Resolution

    61 MP vs 44.8 MP — higher is better

  • Weight

    427 g vs 520 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

sd Quattro H

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    60 frames vs 12 frames — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 240 shots — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 29.97 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265

  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)

    Only sd Quattro H supports it

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • AF points / zonesBoth 49
  • AF frame coverageBoth 90 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

fp L

Pros

  • Tiny full-frame
  • 61MP
  • L-mount
  • Unique industrial design

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Small battery
  • Minimal ergonomics

sd Quattro H

Pros

  • Unique Foveon color
  • High detail per pixel
  • Distinct look

Cons

  • Slow operation
  • Poor low light
  • Limited lens range

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the fp L and sd Quattro H at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

fp L
sd Quattro H
Resolution
61 MP+36%
44.8 MP
Sensor type
BSI CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
36 x 24
23.5 × 15.6 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
fp L
sd Quattro H
Processor
Image processor
Image processor
fp L
sd Quattro H
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
fp L
sd Quattro H
Shutter type
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, fp L or sd Quattro H?

sd Quattro H scores 6.0/10 versus 3.5/10 for fp L — 4K recording.

What's the resolution difference between the fp L and sd Quattro H?

fp L is 61 MP and sd Quattro H is 44.8 MP, so the fp L captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the fp L and sd Quattro H have in-body image stabilization?

fp L does not have IBIS, while sd Quattro H has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the fp L or the sd Quattro H?

fp L reaches 10 fps electronic. sd Quattro H reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the fp L and sd Quattro H?

fp L weighs 427 g and sd Quattro H weighs 520 g, so the fp L is 93 g lighter.

Do the fp L and sd Quattro H record 4K video?

fp L: 4K up to 29.97p. sd Quattro H: 4K up to 60p.

Are the fp L and sd Quattro H weather sealed?

fp L: Yes. sd Quattro H: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 240 shots (CIPA) for the fp L and 640 shots for the sd Quattro H, giving the sd Quattro H the edge.

How much does each cost?

fp L launched at $2,499 and sd Quattro H at $1,299. The sd Quattro H is $1,200 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way fp L vs sd Quattro H vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Sigma press materials.