OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Micro Four Thirds Mount
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro — 60mm f/2.8 for Micro Four Thirds, a popular choice in the om-system lineup.
$549
Launch priceReleased Aug 2019
Sigma
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
Leica L Mount
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art — 105mm f/2.8 for Leica L, a popular choice in the sigma lineup.
$799
Launch priceReleased Jun 2021
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art is 1.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Wins
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
4 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has lower Weight (185 g vs 715 g)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has lower Length (82 mm vs 139.2 mm)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has lower Min focus distance (19 cm vs 29.5 cm)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has lower Diameter (60 mm vs 78.9 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
⌀60 × 82 mm
185 g (0.41 lb / 6.53 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
⌀79 × 139 mm
715 g (1.58 lb / 25.22 oz)
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro is 57mm shorter and 19mm narrower than 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro is 530 g lighter than 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 ED, 1 Super ED
- ✓
Weight
185 g vs 715 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
82 mm vs 139.2 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
19 cm vs 29.5 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
60 mm vs 78.9 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 SLD, 2 Aspherical
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Wide)
Both f/2.8
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/2.8
Max magnification
Both 1 ×
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Pros
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
- ✓Solid optical performance for the price tier
- ✓Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
Pros
- ✓Solid optical performance for the price tier
- ✓Native Leica L mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro and 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art at major authorized retailers.
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Sigma 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.