OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Micro Four Thirds Mount
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro — 60mm f/2.8 for Micro Four Thirds, a popular choice in the om-system lineup.
$549
Launch priceReleased Aug 2019
Sony
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
Sony E Mount
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS — 90mm f/2.8 for Sony E, a popular choice in the sony lineup.
$1,099
Launch priceReleased Jun 2015
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro is 4.1 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Wins
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
3 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BFE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has lower Weight (185 g vs 602 g)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has lower Length (82 mm vs 134 mm)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has lower Min focus distance (19 cm vs 28 cm)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has lower Diameter (60 mm vs 81 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
⌀60 × 82 mm
185 g (0.41 lb / 6.53 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
⌀81 × 134 mm
602 g (1.33 lb / 21.23 oz)
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro is 52mm shorter and 21mm narrower than FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro is 417 g lighter than FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 ED, 1 Super ED
- ✓
Weight
185 g vs 602 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
82 mm vs 134 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
19 cm vs 28 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
60 mm vs 81 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS supports it
- ✓
Control ring
Only FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS supports it
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Wide)
Both f/2.8
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/2.8
Max magnification
Both 1 ×
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Pros
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
- ✓Solid optical performance for the price tier
- ✓Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
Pros
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Sony E mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro and FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS at major authorized retailers.
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Sony FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.