Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Canon

EOS M200

Ultra-compact EF-M body with 24MP, eye detection AF, and flip screen for beginners.

$549

Launch price

Released Sep 2019

vs
EOS R5

Canon

EOS R5

45MP full-frame hybrid with 8K RAW, 4K 120p, strong AF, and 8-stop in-body stabilization.

$3,899

Launch price

Released Jul 2020

EOS R5 is 9 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

4categories

EOS M200

TravelVlogging

Wins

10categories

EOS R5

Video & HybridPortrait

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS M200 wins 1 categories·EOS R5 wins 4 categories
  • BEOS R5 has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BEOS R5 has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BEOS R5 has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AEOS M200 has lower Weight (299 g vs 738 g)
  • BEOS R5 has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)

Key specs at a glance

EOS M200EOS R5
Resolution24.1 MP45 MP
Sensor22.3 × 14.9 mmFull Frame
ISO max25,60051,200
Burst11 fps20 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBISNo8-stop
Weight299 g738 g
Battery640 shots490 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS M200

108 × 67 × 35 mm

299 g (0.66 lb / 10.55 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

EOS R5 front view

EOS R5

139 × 98 × 88 mm

738 g (1.63 lb / 26.03 oz)

EOS M200 is 30mm narrower, 30mm shorter, and 53mm thinner than EOS R5.

EOS M200 is 439 g lighter than EOS R5.

Depth (front-to-back): 35mm EOS M200 · 88mm EOS R5

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS M200

108 × 67 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R5 back view

EOS R5

139 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS M200

108 × 35 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R5 top view

EOS R5

139 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS M200

22.3 × 14.9 mm · APS-C

332 mm² area

EOS R5

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

2.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS M200: mount data unavailable

EOS R5

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS M200EOS R5
Portrait
4.0Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
5.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
4.5Fair
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
1.5Limited
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Wildlife
5.0Fair
5.0Fair
Vlogging
6.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS M200

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 108.2, 67.1, 35.1

  • Weight

    299 g vs 738 g — lower is better

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 490 shots — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R5

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 97.5, 88

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only EOS R5 supports it

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS M200

Pros

  • Very compact
  • 24MP APS-C
  • Eye detection AF
  • Affordable

Cons

  • EF-M mount dead-end
  • No EVF
  • 4K crop

EOS R5

Pros

  • 45MP sensor balances resolution and speed
  • 8K RAW and 4K 120p internal video
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with advanced subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • CFexpress Type B plus SD UHS-II storage

Cons

  • Heat limits can matter for extended high-end video
  • Battery life is modest
  • Still expensive versus newer enthusiast bodies

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS M200 and EOS R5 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS M200
EOS R5
Resolution
24.1 MP
45 MP+87%
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
22.3 × 14.9 mm
36.0 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS M200
EOS R5
Processor
DIGIC X
DIGIC X
EOS M200
EOS R5
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
51,200+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
EOS M200
EOS R5
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS M200 or EOS R5?

EOS R5 scores 8.5/10 versus 1.5/10 for EOS M200 — 45MP — excellent for prints up to 24×36".

What's the resolution difference between the EOS M200 and EOS R5?

EOS M200 is 24.1 MP and EOS R5 is 45 MP, so the EOS R5 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS M200 and EOS R5 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS M200 does not have IBIS, while EOS R5 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS M200 or the EOS R5?

EOS M200 reaches 11 fps electronic. EOS R5 reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS M200 and EOS R5?

EOS M200 weighs 299 g and EOS R5 weighs 738 g, so the EOS M200 is 439 g lighter.

Do the EOS M200 and EOS R5 record 4K video?

EOS M200: 4K up to 60p. EOS R5: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS M200 and EOS R5 weather sealed?

EOS M200: No. EOS R5: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS M200 and 490 shots for the EOS R5, giving the EOS M200 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS M200 launched at $549 and EOS R5 at $3,899. The EOS M200 is $3,350 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS M200 vs EOS R5 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.