Canon
EOS M200
Ultra-compact EF-M body with 24MP, eye detection AF, and flip screen for beginners.
$549
Launch priceReleased Sep 2019
Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
EOS R6 Mark II is 3.2 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS M200
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
6 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- BEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
- BEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 11 fps)
- BEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
- BEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to shareEOS M200
108 × 67 × 35 mm
299 g (0.66 lb / 10.55 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
EOS M200 is 30mm narrower, 31mm shorter, and 53mm thinner than EOS R6 Mark II.
EOS M200 is 371 g lighter than EOS R6 Mark II.
Depth (front-to-back): 35mm EOS M200 · 88mm EOS R6 Mark II
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS M200
108 × 67 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS M200
108 × 35 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS M200
22.3 × 14.9 mm · APS-C
332 mm² area
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
2.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS M200: mount data unavailable
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS M200
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 108.2, 67.1, 35.1
Weight
299 g vs 670 g — lower is better
EVF magnification
0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
Animal / bird AF
Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓AF points / zones — Both 1053
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 60 fps
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS M200
Pros
- ✓Very compact
- ✓24MP APS-C
- ✓Eye detection AF
- ✓Affordable
Cons
- –EF-M mount dead-end
- –No EVF
- –4K crop
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS M200 and EOS R6 Mark II at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS M200
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, EOS M200 or EOS R6 Mark II?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for EOS M200 — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS M200 and EOS R6 Mark II?
EOS M200 is 24.1 MP and EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS M200 and EOS R6 Mark II have in-body image stabilization?
EOS M200 does not have IBIS, while EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS M200 or the EOS R6 Mark II?
EOS M200 reaches 11 fps electronic. EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS M200 and EOS R6 Mark II?
EOS M200 weighs 299 g and EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g, so the EOS M200 is 371 g lighter.
Do the EOS M200 and EOS R6 Mark II record 4K video?
EOS M200: 4K up to 60p. EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS M200 and EOS R6 Mark II weather sealed?
EOS M200: No. EOS R6 Mark II: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS M200 and 760 shots for the EOS R6 Mark II, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS M200 launched at $549 and EOS R6 Mark II at $2,499. The EOS M200 is $1,950 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS M200 vs EOS R6 Mark II vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.