Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Fujifilm

X-T20

Small X-T body with 24MP X-Trans III, 4K recording, and classic Fujifilm controls.

$899

Released Jan 2017

EOS R6 Mark II is 5.8 years newer.

Wins

14categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

2categories

X-T20

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·X-T20 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 23 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 100 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 14 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIX-T20
Resolution24.2 MP24.3 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max102,40012,800
Burst40 fps14 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight680 g383 g
Battery760 shots350 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

X-T20

118 × 83 × 41 mm

383 g (0.84 lb / 13.51 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 20mm wider, 16mm taller, and 47mm thicker than X-T20.

EOS R6 Mark II is 297 g heavier than X-T20.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 41mm X-T20

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

X-T20

118 × 83 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

X-T20

118 × 41 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

X-T20

23.6 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

368 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

X-T20

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIX-T20
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -1 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 23 frames — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 100 Mbps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

X-T20

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 118.4, 82.8, 41.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    383 g vs 680 g — lower is better

  • Resolution

    24.3 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

X-T20

Pros

  • 24MP X-Trans III
  • 4K video
  • Compact body

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Older AF
  • Single card slot

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
X-T20
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.3 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
APS-C X-Trans CMOS III
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
23.6 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
X-T20
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
AF points / zones
10532.5× more
425
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-1 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human
EOS R6 Mark II
X-T20
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+50%
8 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps2.9× more
14 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames7.8× more
23 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
X-T20
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps2× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps3.4× more
100 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
None
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
X-T20
Weight
680 g
383 g−297 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
118.4 × 82.8 × 41.4 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or X-T20?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 3.0/10 for X-T20 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T20?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and X-T20 is 24.3 MP, so the X-T20 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T20 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while x-T20 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the X-T20?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. X-T20 reaches 14 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T20?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and X-T20 weighs 383 g, so the X-T20 is 297 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T20 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. X-T20: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T20 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. X-T20: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 350 shots for the X-T20, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and X-T20 at $899. The X-T20 is $1,600 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.