Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Launch price

Released Nov 2025

vs

Pentax

645Z

51MP medium format DSLR that made digital MF accessible — still prized for landscape and studio.

$8,499

Launch price

Released Apr 2014

EOS R6 Mark III is 11.5 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

3categories

645Z

WildlifeLandscape

5 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark III wins 5 categories·645Z wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 101)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has lower Weight (699 g vs 1470 g)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark III645Z
Resolution32.5 MP51.4 MP
SensorFull Frame43.8 × 32.8 mm
ISO max64,00025,600
Burst40 fps20 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stop7-stop
Weight699 g1470 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

645Z

156 × 117 × 123 mm

1470 g (3.24 lb / 51.85 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III is 18mm narrower, 19mm shorter, and 35mm thinner than 645Z.

EOS R6 Mark III is 771 g lighter than 645Z.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 123mm 645Z

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

645Z

156 × 117 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

645Z

156 × 123 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

645Z

43.8 × 32.8 mm · Medium Format

1437 mm² area

1.7× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

645Z: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark III645Z
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 101 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    64,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • Weight

    699 g vs 1470 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

645Z

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 156, 117, 123

  • Resolution

    51.4 MP vs 32.5 MP — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    64 vs 100 — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

645Z

Pros

  • 51MP medium format
  • CMOS sensor
  • Pentax color
  • Relatively affordable MF

Cons

  • Huge body
  • Slow operation
  • Limited lens line vs Hasselblad

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark III and 645Z at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark III
645Z
Resolution
32.5 MP
51.4 MP+58%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Medium Format CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
43.8 × 32.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark III
645Z
Processor
DIGIC X
Image processor
EOS R6 Mark III
645Z
ISO min (native)
100
64−36 less
ISO max (native)
64,000+1.3 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
EOS R6 Mark III
645Z
Shutter type
Mechanical / Electronic 1st Curtain + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark III or 645Z?

EOS R6 Mark III scores 10.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for 645Z — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and 645Z?

EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and 645Z is 51.4 MP, so the 645Z captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and 645Z have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while 645Z has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the 645Z?

EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. 645Z reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and 645Z?

EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and 645Z weighs 1470 g, so the EOS R6 Mark III is 771 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and 645Z record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. 645Z: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark III and 645Z weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. 645Z: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 640 shots for the 645Z, giving the 645Z the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and 645Z at $8,499. The EOS R6 Mark III is $5,700 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark III vs 645Z vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Pentax press materials.