Canon
EOS R8 Mark II
Compact 24.2MP full-frame RF body with 5-axis IBIS (up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS), Dual Pixel CMOS AF II, 40fps electronic bursts, and 6K-oversampled 4K 60p.
$1,899
Launch priceReleased Sep 2026
Panasonic
Lumix FZ300
Weather-resistant bridge camera with constant f/2.8 25-600mm equivalent Leica zoom and 4K video.
$599
Launch priceReleased Jul 2015
EOS R8 Mark II is 11.2 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R8 Mark II
Wins
Lumix FZ300
4 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R8 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (7.5 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R8 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
- AEOS R8 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (25,600 vs 6,400)
- AEOS R8 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (73 frames vs 20 frames)
- AEOS R8 Mark II has higher 1080p max frame rate (180 fps vs 60 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R8 Mark II
131 × 90 × 80 mm
499 g (1.10 lb / 17.60 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
Lumix FZ300
132 × 92 × 117 mm
691 g (1.52 lb / 24.37 oz)
EOS R8 Mark II is 2mm shorter and 37mm thinner than Lumix FZ300.
EOS R8 Mark II is 192 g lighter than Lumix FZ300.
Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R8 Mark II · 117mm Lumix FZ300
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R8 Mark II
131 × 90 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Lumix FZ300
132 × 92 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R8 Mark II
131 × 80 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Lumix FZ300
132 × 117 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R8 Mark II
36 × 24 mm · Full Frame
864 mm² area
Lumix FZ300
6.17 × 4.55 mm · Compact
28 mm² area
30.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R8 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
Lumix FZ300: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R8 Mark II
AF low-light limit
-7.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better
Codecs
Adds XF-HEVC S
IBIS effectiveness
7.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Stabilization modes
Adds IBIS, Coordinated Control IS, Movie Digital IS…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 131.3, 89.9, 79.8
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
AF points / zones
1053 vs 49 — higher is better
ISO max (native)
25,600 vs 6,400 — higher is better
Reasons to choose
Lumix FZ300
Codecs
Adds H.264, MP4, AVCHD
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 131.6, 91.5, 117.1
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Subject recognition
Adds Face, Eye
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
60 fps vs 40 fps — higher is better
Battery life (CIPA)
380 shots vs 340 shots — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Card slots — Both 1
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R8 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Lightest EOS full-frame body with IBIS (546g)
- ✓Up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS
- ✓40fps electronic + 20-frame pre-capture
- ✓Uncropped 6K-oversampled 4K 60p / FHD 180p
- ✓Wi-Fi 6, USB 10 Gbps, headphone jack
Cons
- –Same 24.2MP sensor as original R8
- –Single SD UHS-II slot
- –LP-E17 battery (~340 LCD / 220 EVF shots)
- –No mechanical shutter
Lumix FZ300
Pros
- ✓Constant f/2.8 24x zoom
- ✓Weather resistant
- ✓4K video
- ✓Great reach
Cons
- –Small 1/2.3-inch sensor
- –12MP
- –Bridge-camera bulk
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R8 Mark II and Lumix FZ300 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
Panasonic Lumix FZ300
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R8 Mark II or Lumix FZ300?
EOS R8 Mark II scores 10.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for Lumix FZ300 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and Lumix FZ300?
EOS R8 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Lumix FZ300 is 12.1 MP, so the EOS R8 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R8 Mark II and Lumix FZ300 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R8 Mark II has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Lumix FZ300 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R8 Mark II or the Lumix FZ300?
EOS R8 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Lumix FZ300 reaches 60 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and Lumix FZ300?
EOS R8 Mark II weighs 499 g and Lumix FZ300 weighs 691 g, so the EOS R8 Mark II is 192 g lighter.
Do the EOS R8 Mark II and Lumix FZ300 record 4K video?
EOS R8 Mark II: 4K up to 59.94p. Lumix FZ300: 4K up to 30p.
Are the EOS R8 Mark II and Lumix FZ300 weather sealed?
EOS R8 Mark II: Yes. Lumix FZ300: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 340 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R8 Mark II and 380 shots for the Lumix FZ300, giving the Lumix FZ300 the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R8 Mark II launched at $1,899 and Lumix FZ300 at $599. The Lumix FZ300 is $1,300 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R8 Mark II vs Lumix FZ300 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.