Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R8 Mark II

Canon

EOS R8 Mark II

Compact 24.2MP full-frame RF body with 5-axis IBIS (up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS), Dual Pixel CMOS AF II, 40fps electronic bursts, and 6K-oversampled 4K 60p.

$1,899

Launch price

Released Sep 2026

vs

Ricoh

WG-1000

Entry rugged waterproof compact with 16.35MP sensor, 4x 27-108mm equivalent zoom, USB-C, and simple controls.

$229

Launch price

Released Jun 2024

EOS R8 Mark II is 2.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

EOS R8 Mark II

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

1categories

WG-1000

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R8 Mark II wins 4 categories·WG-1000 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 9)
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (25,600 vs 3,200)
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher 1080p max frame rate (180 fps vs 30 fps)
  • BWG-1000 has lower Weight (220 g vs 499 g)
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (250 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R8 Mark IIWG-1000
Resolution24.2 MP16.35 MP
SensorFull Frame1/2.3 inch
ISO max25,6003,200
Burst40 fps
4K59.94 fps
IBIS7.5-stopNo
Weight499 g220 g
Battery340 shots300 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R8 Mark II front view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 90 × 80 mm

499 g (1.10 lb / 17.60 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

WG-1000

116 × 69 × 51 mm

220 g (0.49 lb / 7.76 oz)

EOS R8 Mark II is 15mm wider, 21mm taller, and 29mm thicker than WG-1000.

EOS R8 Mark II is 279 g heavier than WG-1000.

Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R8 Mark II · 51mm WG-1000

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R8 Mark II back view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 90 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

WG-1000

116 × 69 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R8 Mark II top view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

WG-1000

116 × 51 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R8 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R8 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

WG-1000: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R8 Mark IIWG-1000
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited✓ wins
1.0Limited
Landscape
6.0Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
2.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R8 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds XF-HEVC S

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds IBIS, Coordinated Control IS, Movie Digital IS…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.3, 89.9, 79.8

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 9 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    25,600 vs 3,200 — higher is better

  • 1080p max frame rate

    180 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R8 Mark II supports it

Reasons to choose

WG-1000

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Pet

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 116, 68.5, 50.5

  • Weight

    220 g vs 499 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 1

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R8 Mark II

Pros

  • Lightest EOS full-frame body with IBIS (546g)
  • Up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS
  • 40fps electronic + 20-frame pre-capture
  • Uncropped 6K-oversampled 4K 60p / FHD 180p
  • Wi-Fi 6, USB 10 Gbps, headphone jack

Cons

  • Same 24.2MP sensor as original R8
  • Single SD UHS-II slot
  • LP-E17 battery (~340 LCD / 220 EVF shots)
  • No mechanical shutter

WG-1000

Pros

  • Waterproof and dustproof
  • USB-C
  • Affordable rugged camera
  • 4x optical zoom

Cons

  • Small sensor
  • Full HD only
  • Basic feature set

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R8 Mark II and WG-1000 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R8 Mark II
WG-1000
Resolution
24.2 MP+48%
16.35 MP
Sensor type
CMOS
1/2.3" CMOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
1/2.3 inch
AA filter
Yes
EOS R8 Mark II
WG-1000
Aperture
F3.0-F6.6
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
27-108 mm
EOS R8 Mark II
WG-1000
Processor
DIGIC X
Image processor
EOS R8 Mark II
WG-1000
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600+3 stops
3,200
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
3,200
EOS R8 Mark II
WG-1000
Shutter type
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R8 Mark II or WG-1000?

EOS R8 Mark II scores 10.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for WG-1000 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and WG-1000?

EOS R8 Mark II is 24.2 MP and WG-1000 is 16.35 MP, so the EOS R8 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R8 Mark II and WG-1000 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R8 Mark II has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while WG-1000 does not have IBIS.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and WG-1000?

EOS R8 Mark II weighs 499 g and WG-1000 weighs 220 g, so the WG-1000 is 279 g lighter.

Do the EOS R8 Mark II and WG-1000 record 4K video?

EOS R8 Mark II: 4K up to 59.94p. WG-1000: Full HD.

Are the EOS R8 Mark II and WG-1000 weather sealed?

EOS R8 Mark II: Yes. WG-1000: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 340 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R8 Mark II and 300 shots for the WG-1000, giving the EOS R8 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R8 Mark II launched at $1,899 and WG-1000 at $229. The WG-1000 is $1,670 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R8 Mark II vs WG-1000 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Ricoh press materials.