Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Leica

Q3

Full-frame fixed 28mm f/1.7 premium compact for documentary and travel.

$5,995

Released May 2023

vs

Panasonic

Lumix FZ300

Weather-resistant bridge camera with constant f/2.8 25-600mm equivalent Leica zoom and 4K video.

$599

Released Jul 2015

Q3 is 7.8 years newer.

Wins

7categories

Q3

LandscapePortrait

Wins

4categories

Lumix FZ300

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

Q3 wins 3 categories·Lumix FZ300 wins 2 categories
  • AQ3 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 6,400)
  • AQ3 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 12.1 MP)
  • BLumix FZ300 has higher Burst (electronic) (60 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AQ3 has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 1,440,000)
  • BLumix FZ300 has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 4 fps)

Key specs at a glance

Q3Lumix FZ300
Resolution60.3 MP12.1 MP
SensorFull Frame6.17 x 4.55 mm
ISO max100,0006,400
Burst15 fps60 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight743 g691 g
Battery350 shots380 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Q3

130 × 80 × 92 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

Lumix FZ300

132 × 92 × 117 mm

691 g (1.52 lb / 24.37 oz)

Q3 is 2mm narrower, 12mm shorter, and 25mm thinner than Lumix FZ300.

Q3 is 52 g heavier than Lumix FZ300.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm Q3 · 117mm Lumix FZ300

Sensor size, to scale

Q3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lumix FZ300

6.17 × 4.55 mm · Compact

28 mm² area

30.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseQ3Lumix FZ300
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
4.5Fair
5.0Fair✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
8.0Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
4.5Fair
4.5Fair
Wildlife
5.5Fair
5.5Fair
Vlogging
3.0Limited
5.0Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Q3

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130, 80, 92

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • ISO max (native)

    100,000 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 12.1 MP — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 1,440,000 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, ProRes

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix FZ300

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.6, 91.5, 117.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Burst (electronic)

    60 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds MP4, AVCHD

  • Microphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only Lumix FZ300 supports it

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    380 shots vs 350 shots — higher is better

  • Weight

    691 g vs 743 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Q3

Pros

  • 60MP full-frame
  • Summilux 28mm lens
  • Built like a tank
  • Unique aesthetic

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Very expensive
  • No interchangeable system

Lumix FZ300

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8 24x zoom
  • Weather resistant
  • 4K video
  • Great reach

Cons

  • Small 1/2.3-inch sensor
  • 12MP
  • Bridge-camera bulk

Full specifications

= category winner

Q3
Lumix FZ300
Resolution
60.3 MP5× more
12.1 MP
Sensor type
Full-frame BSI CMOS
1/2.3-inch High Sensitivity MOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
6.17 x 4.55 mm
AA filter
No
No
Q3
Lumix FZ300
AF system
Hybrid AF (phase detection + contrast AF + DFD)
Contrast AF with DFD technology
AF points / zones
49
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-3 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Face, Eye, Animal
Human, Face, Eye, Animal
Q3
Lumix FZ300
Burst (mechanical)
4 fps
12 fps3× more
Burst (electronic)
15 fps
60 fps4× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
No
RAW buffer depth
20 frames
Q3
Lumix FZ300
Max resolution
8K
4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps2× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps+50%
100 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
L-Log / HLG
None
Codecs
H.265, H.264, ProRes
H.264, MP4, AVCHD
Q3
Lumix FZ300
Weight
743 g
691 g−52 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
130 × 80 × 92 mm
131.6 × 91.5 × 117.1 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, Q3 or Lumix FZ300?

Q3 scores 8.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for Lumix FZ300 — 60.3MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the Q3 and Lumix FZ300?

Q3 is 60.3 MP and Lumix FZ300 is 12.1 MP, so the Q3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Q3 and Lumix FZ300 have in-body image stabilization?

Q3 does not have IBIS, while lumix FZ300 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Q3 or the Lumix FZ300?

Q3 reaches 15 fps electronic. Lumix FZ300 reaches 60 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Q3 and Lumix FZ300?

Q3 weighs 743 g and Lumix FZ300 weighs 691 g, so the Lumix FZ300 is 52 g lighter.

Do the Q3 and Lumix FZ300 record 4K video?

Q3: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. Lumix FZ300: 4K up to 30p.

Are the Q3 and Lumix FZ300 weather sealed?

Q3: Yes. Lumix FZ300: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the Q3 and 380 shots for the Lumix FZ300, giving the Lumix FZ300 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Q3 launched at $5,995 and Lumix FZ300 at $599. The Lumix FZ300 is $5,396 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.