Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Z6 III

Nikon

Z6 III

First partially stacked full-frame sensor with 6K N-RAW internal video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Jun 2024

vs
Alpha 6700

Sony

Alpha 6700

26MP APS-C flagship with AI subject tracking, 4K 120p, and 5-stop IBIS.

$1,399

Launch price

Released Jul 2023

Z6 III is 11 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

Z6 III

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

6categories

Alpha 6700

TravelSports & Action

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Z6 III wins 4 categories·Alpha 6700 wins 1 categories
  • AZ6 III has higher RAW buffer depth (1000 frames vs 59 frames)
  • AZ6 III has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 11 fps)
  • BAlpha 6700 has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 299)
  • AZ6 III has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,359,296)
  • AZ6 III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 32,000)

Key specs at a glance

Z6 IIIAlpha 6700
Resolution24.5 MP26 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max64,00032,000
Burst120 fps11 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop5-stop
Weight760 g493 g
Battery360 shots550 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Z6 III front view

Z6 III

139 × 102 × 74 mm

760 g (1.68 lb / 26.81 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 6700 front view

Alpha 6700

122 × 69 × 75 mm

493 g (1.09 lb / 17.39 oz)

Z6 III is 1mm thinner than Alpha 6700 but it is also 17mm wider and 33mm taller.

Z6 III is 267 g heavier than Alpha 6700.

Depth (front-to-back): 74mm Z6 III · 75mm Alpha 6700

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Z6 III back view

Z6 III

139 × 102 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 6700 back view

Alpha 6700

122 × 69 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Z6 III top view

Z6 III

139 × 74 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 6700 top view

Alpha 6700

122 × 75 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Z6 III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Alpha 6700

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Z6 III

Nikon Z

90+

native lenses available

40 first-party50 third-party

Alpha 6700

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseZ6 IIIAlpha 6700
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Travel
5.5Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
7.0Good✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins

The verdict

The $1100 price gap separates the Nikon Z6 III's high-speed full-frame performance from the Sony Alpha 6700's compact APS-C design.

Choose the Nikon Z6 III if you require a professional video workflow and fast-action capabilities, as it offers 6K RAW video and a 20fps electronic burst rate with a 200-shot RAW buffer. Its 8-stop in-body image stabilization and dual card slots provide the reliability needed for demanding productions.

Choose the Sony Alpha 6700 if portability and battery efficiency are priorities for travel or street photography. This 493g body delivers 560 shots per charge and features an advanced 759-point AI phase-detect autofocus system that includes insect recognition.

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Z6 III

  • AF low-light limit

    -10 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Dogs…

  • Codecs

    Adds ProRes RAW, ProRes RAW HQ, Raw…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 101.5, 74

  • RAW buffer depth

    1000 frames vs 59 frames — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,359,296 — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only Z6 III supports it

Reasons to choose

Alpha 6700

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 122, 69, 75.1

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 299 — higher is better

  • Weight

    493 g vs 760 g — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    550 shots vs 360 shots — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    1.07 × vs 0.8 × — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    280 Mbps vs 250 Mbps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 120 fps
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Z6 III

Pros

  • Partially stacked CMOS reduces rolling shutter
  • 6K N-RAW 60p internal — true filmmaking capability
  • 5.76M dot EVF — best-in-class resolution
  • 14fps mechanical burst

Cons

  • EN-EL15c battery life only 380 CIPA shots
  • Smaller lens ecosystem vs. Canon RF

Alpha 6700

Pros

  • AI-based subject recognition from A7R V
  • 4K 120p Super35 — outstanding slow-motion
  • 5-stop IBIS in a compact APS-C body
  • 10-bit 4:2:2 internal recording

Cons

  • Single card slot
  • APS-C sensor — narrower DR vs. full-frame
  • LCD resolution 1.03M dots — below competitors
  • No headphone jack

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Z6 III and Alpha 6700 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Z6 III
Alpha 6700
Resolution
24.5 MP
26 MP+6%
Sensor type
Partially Stacked CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 x 23.9 mm
23.3 x 15.5 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
Z6 III
Alpha 6700
Processor
EXPEED 7
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
Z6 III
Alpha 6700
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
64,000+1 stop
32,000
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
Z6 III
Alpha 6700
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000
1/4000
Max electronic speed
1/16000
1/8000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, Z6 III or Alpha 6700?

Z6 III scores 7.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for Alpha 6700 — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.

What's the resolution difference between the Z6 III and Alpha 6700?

Z6 III is 24.5 MP and Alpha 6700 is 26 MP, so the Alpha 6700 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Z6 III and Alpha 6700 have in-body image stabilization?

Z6 III has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 6700 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Z6 III or the Alpha 6700?

Z6 III reaches 120 fps electronic. Alpha 6700 reaches 11 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Z6 III and Alpha 6700?

Z6 III weighs 760 g and Alpha 6700 weighs 493 g, so the Alpha 6700 is 267 g lighter.

Do the Z6 III and Alpha 6700 record 4K video?

Z6 III: 4K up to 120p. Alpha 6700: 4K up to 120p.

Are the Z6 III and Alpha 6700 weather sealed?

Z6 III: Yes. Alpha 6700: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 360 shots (CIPA) for the Z6 III and 550 shots for the Alpha 6700, giving the Alpha 6700 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Z6 III launched at $2,499 and Alpha 6700 at $1,399. The Alpha 6700 is $1,100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Z6 III vs Alpha 6700 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Nikon and Sony press materials.