Panasonic
HC-X1600
Mid-tier 4K60p camcorder with 1/2.5-inch MOS sensor, 24x 25–600mm zoom, 3G-SDI, face-detection AF, and USB-PD power.
$1,699
Launch priceReleased Mar 2021
Sony
PXW-Z200
AI-powered XDCAM with 1-inch Exmor RS sensor, 20x G Lens zoom, 4K60/120p, 12G-SDI, XAVC MXF, variable ND, and RTMP/SRT streaming.
$3,999
Launch priceReleased Sep 2024
PXW-Z200 is 3.5 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
HC-X1600
Wins
PXW-Z200
9 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AHC-X1600 has lower Weight (580 g vs 1960 g)
- BPXW-Z200 has higher RAW buffer depth (120 frames vs 60 frames)
- BPXW-Z200 has higher Resolution (14 MP vs 8.29 MP)
- BPXW-Z200 has higher Burst (mechanical) (8 fps vs 6 fps)
- BPXW-Z200 has higher Burst (electronic) (20 fps vs 15 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to shareHC-X1600
134 × 91 × 72 mm
580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
PXW-Z200
176 × 201 × 371 mm
1960 g (4.32 lb / 69.14 oz)
HC-X1600 is 42mm narrower, 110mm shorter, and 299mm thinner than PXW-Z200.
HC-X1600 is 1380 g lighter than PXW-Z200.
Depth (front-to-back): 72mm HC-X1600 · 371mm PXW-Z200
Sensor size, to scale
HC-X1600
17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds
225 mm² area
PXW-Z200
13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1″
116 mm² area
1.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
HC-X1600
Codecs
Adds H.265, H.264, ProRes
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 134, 91, 72
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II
Weight
580 g vs 1960 g — lower is better
Internal RAW video
Only HC-X1600 supports it
In-body stabilization (IBIS)
Only HC-X1600 supports it
Weather sealing
Only HC-X1600 supports it
Reasons to choose
PXW-Z200
Codecs
Adds XAVC MXF, XAVC S-I, XAVC HS…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 175.6, 201.3, 371.1
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
RAW buffer depth
120 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better
Resolution
14 MP vs 8.29 MP — higher is better
Burst (mechanical)
8 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
20 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better
IBIS effectiveness
7 stops vs 6 stops — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓ISO max (native) — Both 25,600
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
HC-X1600
Pros
- ✓4K 60p internal recording
- ✓24x f/1.8–4.0 optical zoom
- ✓3G-SDI + full HDMI output
- ✓Face Detection AF/AE
- ✓USB-PD + dual SD slots
Cons
- –1/2.5-inch sensor
- –No XLR without handle unit
- –Smaller sensor than HC-X2
- –Superseded by HC-X2100 in lineup
PXW-Z200
Pros
- ✓12G-SDI + timecode in/out for broadcast
- ✓XAVC MXF / XAVC S-I / XAVC HS codecs
- ✓AI subject recognition AF + auto framing
- ✓4K up to 60p / 120p slow motion
- ✓Variable ND (1/4–1/128) + S-Cinetone
Cons
- –Premium over HXR-NX800
- –Heavy at 1.96 kg body-only
- –Some MXF features require firmware 2.0+
- –C3 Portal streaming is paid add-on
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the HC-X1600 and PXW-Z200 at major authorized retailers.
Panasonic HC-X1600
Sony PXW-Z200
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for travel, HC-X1600 or PXW-Z200?
HC-X1600 scores 7.5/10 versus 3.0/10 for PXW-Z200 — 580g — compact and travel-friendly.
What's the resolution difference between the HC-X1600 and PXW-Z200?
HC-X1600 is 8.29 MP and PXW-Z200 is 14 MP, so the PXW-Z200 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the HC-X1600 and PXW-Z200 have in-body image stabilization?
HC-X1600 has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while PXW-Z200 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the HC-X1600 or the PXW-Z200?
HC-X1600 reaches 15 fps electronic. PXW-Z200 reaches 20 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the HC-X1600 and PXW-Z200?
HC-X1600 weighs 580 g and PXW-Z200 weighs 1960 g, so the HC-X1600 is 1380 g lighter.
Do the HC-X1600 and PXW-Z200 record 4K video?
HC-X1600: 4K up to 60p. PXW-Z200: 4K up to 60p.
Are the HC-X1600 and PXW-Z200 weather sealed?
HC-X1600: Yes. PXW-Z200: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the HC-X1600 and 640 shots for the PXW-Z200, giving the PXW-Z200 the edge.
How much does each cost?
HC-X1600 launched at $1,699 and PXW-Z200 at $3,999. The HC-X1600 is $2,300 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way HC-X1600 vs PXW-Z200 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.