Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Panasonic

Lumix G9 II

MFT hybrid with 8-stop IBIS and 75fps stills for wildlife on a budget.

$1,899

Released Sep 2023

vs
Alpha 7R VI

Sony

Alpha 7R VI

66.8MP fully-stacked full-frame high-resolution body with 30fps bursts, 8K 30p, 4K 120p, and Sony's new BIONZ XR2 engine.

$4,499

Released Jun 2026

Alpha 7R VI is 2.8 years newer.

Wins

5categories

Lumix G9 II

Video & HybridSports & Action

Wins

6categories

Alpha 7R VI

PortraitVideo & Hybrid

3 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

Lumix G9 II wins 2 categories·Alpha 7R VI wins 3 categories
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Resolution (66.8 MP vs 25.2 MP)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 3,680,000)
  • ALumix G9 II has higher Burst (electronic) (75 fps vs 30 fps)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Battery life (CIPA) (600 shots vs 390 shots)
  • ALumix G9 II has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 150 frames)

Key specs at a glance

Lumix G9 IIAlpha 7R VI
Resolution25.2 MP66.8 MP
SensorMFTFull Frame
ISO max25,60032,000
Burst75 fps30 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stopYes
Weight658 g713 g
Battery390 shots600 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Lumix G9 II

134 × 102 × 90 mm

658 g (1.45 lb / 23.21 oz)

Alpha 7R VI front view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 × 83 mm

713 g (1.57 lb / 25.15 oz)

Lumix G9 II is 2mm wider, 5mm taller, and 7mm thicker than Alpha 7R VI.

Lumix G9 II is 55 g lighter than Alpha 7R VI.

Depth (front-to-back): 90mm Lumix G9 II · 83mm Alpha 7R VI

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Lumix G9 II

134 × 102 mm

Alpha 7R VI back view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Lumix G9 II

134 × 90 mm

Alpha 7R VI top view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Lumix G9 II

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Alpha 7R VI

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Lumix G9 II

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Alpha 7R VI

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseLumix G9 IIAlpha 7R VI
Portrait
6.0Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Landscape
5.0Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
7.0Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Lumix G9 II

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.3, 102.3, 90.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • Burst (electronic)

    75 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Car, Motorcycle

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only Lumix G9 II supports it

  • Internal RAW video

    Only Lumix G9 II supports it

  • Weather sealing

    Only Lumix G9 II supports it

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7R VI

  • AF low-light limit

    -6 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132.7, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SDXC UHS-II

  • Resolution

    66.8 MP vs 25.2 MP — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 3,680,000 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bird, Insect, Vehicle

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    600 shots vs 390 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 120 fps
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • Card slotsBoth 2

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Lumix G9 II

Pros

  • 75fps stills mode
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Compact tele reach

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Video not GH-level

Alpha 7R VI

Pros

  • 66.8MP fully-stacked Exmor RS sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free electronic burst
  • 8K 30p and 4K 120p video
  • 8.5-stop in-body stabilization
  • 9.44M-dot HDR OLED EVF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large files demand fast cards and storage
  • 8K workflow can be heavy

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Lumix G9 II and Alpha 7R VI at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

Lumix G9 II
Alpha 7R VI
Resolution
25.2 MP
66.8 MP2.7× more
Sensor type
Four Thirds Live MOS
Full-Frame Stacked CMOS
Sensor size
17.3 x 13.0 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
No
No
Lumix G9 II
Alpha 7R VI
AF system
Phase Hybrid AF with DFD technology
Contrast Detection / Phase Detection
AF points / zones
779+3%
759
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-4 EV
-6 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Face, Eye, Animal, Car, Motorcycle
Human, Animal, Bird, Eye, Insect, Vehicle
Lumix G9 II
Alpha 7R VI
Burst (mechanical)
14 fps
Burst (electronic)
75 fps2.5× more
30 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
RAW buffer depth
200 frames+33%
150 frames
Lumix G9 II
Alpha 7R VI
Max resolution
5.8K Open Gate
8K
4K max frame rate
120 fps
120 fps
Max video bit rate
800 Mbps+33%
600 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
V-Log / HLG
S-Cinetone / S-Log3
Codecs
Apple ProRes 422 HQ, H.265, H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
Lumix G9 II
Alpha 7R VI
Weight
658 g−55 g less
713 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
134.3 × 102.3 × 90.1 mm
132.7 × 96.9 × 82.9 mm
Weather sealing
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, Lumix G9 II or Alpha 7R VI?

Lumix G9 II scores 9.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for Alpha 7R VI — 75fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the Lumix G9 II and Alpha 7R VI?

Lumix G9 II is 25.2 MP and Alpha 7R VI is 66.8 MP, so the Alpha 7R VI captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Lumix G9 II and Alpha 7R VI have in-body image stabilization?

Lumix G9 II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7R VI has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Lumix G9 II or the Alpha 7R VI?

Lumix G9 II reaches 75 fps electronic. Alpha 7R VI reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Lumix G9 II and Alpha 7R VI?

Lumix G9 II weighs 658 g and Alpha 7R VI weighs 713 g, so the Lumix G9 II is 55 g lighter.

Do the Lumix G9 II and Alpha 7R VI record 4K video?

Lumix G9 II: 5.8K Open Gate (max), 4K up to 120p. Alpha 7R VI: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the Lumix G9 II and Alpha 7R VI weather sealed?

Lumix G9 II: Yes. Alpha 7R VI: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 390 shots (CIPA) for the Lumix G9 II and 600 shots for the Alpha 7R VI, giving the Alpha 7R VI the edge.

How much does each cost?

Lumix G9 II launched at $1,899 and Alpha 7R VI at $4,499. The Lumix G9 II is $2,600 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Panasonic and Sony press materials.