Sony
Alpha 6700
26MP APS-C flagship with AI subject tracking, 4K 120p, and 5-stop IBIS.
$1,399
Launch priceReleased Jul 2023
Sony
FX5
2026 Cinema Line full-frame camera with 16.6MP stacked Exmor RS, 5K Open Gate, internal 16-bit X-OCN RAW, triple base ISO, and FX3-class compact mobility.
$4,899
Launch priceReleased Aug 2026
FX5 is 3.1 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
Alpha 6700
Wins
FX5
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AAlpha 6700 has higher Burst (mechanical) (11 fps vs 0 fps)
- AAlpha 6700 has higher Burst (electronic) (11 fps vs 0 fps)
- AAlpha 6700 has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 800)
- BFX5 has higher EVF resolution (7,070,000 vs 2,359,296)
- AAlpha 6700 has higher ISO max (native) (32,000 vs 12,800)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
Alpha 6700
122 × 69 × 75 mm
493 g (1.09 lb / 17.39 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FX5
132 × 79 × 87 mm
734 g (1.62 lb / 25.89 oz)
Alpha 6700 is 10mm narrower, 10mm shorter, and 12mm thinner than FX5.
Alpha 6700 is 241 g lighter than FX5.
Depth (front-to-back): 75mm Alpha 6700 · 87mm FX5
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
Alpha 6700
122 × 69 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
FX5
132 × 79 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
Alpha 6700
122 × 75 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
FX5
132 × 87 mm
Sensor size, to scale
Alpha 6700
23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C
361 mm² area
FX5
35.7 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame
850 mm² area
2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
Alpha 6700
✓ more lensesSony E
350+
native lenses available
FX5
✓ more lensesSony E
350+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
Alpha 6700
Burst (mechanical)
11 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
11 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 122, 69, 75.1
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
ISO min (native)
100 vs 800 — lower is better
ISO max (native)
32,000 vs 12,800 — higher is better
Subject recognition
Adds Insect, Car/Train, Airplane
Resolution
26 MP vs 16.6 MP — higher is better
Reasons to choose
FX5
AF low-light limit
-6 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 132.3, 79, 86.95
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type A, SD UHS-II
EVF resolution
7,070,000 vs 2,359,296 — higher is better
Codecs
Adds X-OCN LT, X-OCN C1, X-OCN C2…
RAW buffer depth
120 frames vs 59 frames — higher is better
AA filter
Only FX5 supports it
1080p max frame rate
240 fps vs 120 fps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AF points / zones — Both 759
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 120 fps
- ✓In-body stabilization (IBIS) — Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
Alpha 6700
Pros
- ✓AI-based subject recognition from A7R V
- ✓4K 120p Super35 — outstanding slow-motion
- ✓5-stop IBIS in a compact APS-C body
- ✓10-bit 4:2:2 internal recording
Cons
- –Single card slot
- –APS-C sensor — narrower DR vs. full-frame
- –LCD resolution 1.03M dots — below competitors
- –No headphone jack
FX5
Pros
- ✓5K Open Gate + internal X-OCN RAW (LT / C1 / C2)
- ✓Triple base ISO 800 / 4000 / 12800 + Dual Gain
- ✓15+ stops DR (S-Log3) + BIONZ XR2 AI AF
- ✓5K 60p / 4K 120p / FHD 240p at launch
- ✓Compact body with IBIS, cooling, dual card slots
Cons
- –Body-only $4,899 — XLR handle / OLED EVF optional
- –Open Gate X-OCN only at launch (XAVC Open Gate via FW)
- –4K 240p / 5K 120p planned for 2027 firmware
- –No built-in EVF (optional DVF-EL1)
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the Alpha 6700 and FX5 at major authorized retailers.
Sony Alpha 6700
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for travel, Alpha 6700 or FX5?
Alpha 6700 scores 8.5/10 versus 4.5/10 for FX5 — 493g — ultralight for all-day carry.
What's the resolution difference between the Alpha 6700 and FX5?
Alpha 6700 is 26 MP and FX5 is 16.6 MP, so the Alpha 6700 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the Alpha 6700 and FX5 have in-body image stabilization?
Alpha 6700 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization, while FX5 has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization.
What's the weight difference between the Alpha 6700 and FX5?
Alpha 6700 weighs 493 g and FX5 weighs 734 g, so the Alpha 6700 is 241 g lighter.
Do the Alpha 6700 and FX5 record 4K video?
Alpha 6700: 4K up to 120p. FX5: 4K up to 120p.
Are the Alpha 6700 and FX5 weather sealed?
Alpha 6700: Yes. FX5: Yes.
How much does each cost?
Alpha 6700 launched at $1,399 and FX5 at $4,899. The Alpha 6700 is $3,500 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way Alpha 6700 vs FX5 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.
Product images courtesy of Sony press materials.