Fujifilm
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm GFX Mount
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR — 100–200mm f/5.6 for Fujifilm GFX, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$1,999
Launch priceReleased Feb 2021
Nikon
NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S
Nikon Z Mount
NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S — 100–400mm f/4.5-5.6 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the nikon lineup.
$2,699
Launch priceReleased Dec 2021
NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S is 10 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Wins
NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BNIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S has lower Min focus distance (38 cm vs 75 cm)
- AGF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR has lower Length (183 mm vs 251 mm)
- AGF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR has lower Weight (1050 g vs 1435 g)
- BNIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S has higher Max magnification (0.25 × vs 0.2 ×)
- BNIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/4.5 vs f/5.6)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareGF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
⌀89 × 183 mm
1050 g (2.31 lb / 37.04 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S
⌀81 × 251 mm
1435 g (3.16 lb / 50.62 oz)
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR is 68mm shorter and 8mm wider than NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S.
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR is 385 g lighter than NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Aspherical, 2 ED, 1 Super ED
- ✓
Length
183 mm vs 251 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
1050 g vs 1435 g — lower is better
Reasons to choose the NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
Min focus distance
38 cm vs 75 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/4.5 vs f/5.6 — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
81 mm vs 89 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.25 × vs 0.2 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/5.6
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
OIS effectiveness
Both 5 stops
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR and NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Nikon NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.