Canon
EOS R5 Mark II
45MP stacked-sensor powerhouse with 8K 60p RAW internal and 30fps burst.
$4,299
Launch priceReleased Jul 2024
Nikon
Z6 III
First partially stacked full-frame sensor with 6K N-RAW internal video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Jun 2024
Released within a month of each other.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R5 Mark II
Wins
Z6 III
5 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- BZ6 III has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 30 fps)
- AEOS R5 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 273)
- AEOS R5 Mark II has higher Resolution (45 MP vs 24.5 MP)
- BZ6 III has higher RAW buffer depth (1000 frames vs 600 frames)
- BZ6 III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 51,200)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
EOS R5 Mark II
139 × 101 × 94 mm
746 g (1.64 lb / 26.31 oz)
Z6 III
139 × 102 × 74 mm
760 g (1.68 lb / 26.81 oz)
EOS R5 Mark II is 20mm thicker than Z6 III.
EOS R5 Mark II is 14 g lighter than Z6 III.
Depth (front-to-back): 94mm EOS R5 Mark II · 74mm Z6 III
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R5 Mark II
139 × 101 mm
Z6 III
139 × 102 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R5 Mark II
139 × 94 mm
Z6 III
139 × 74 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R5 Mark II
36 × 24 mm · Full Frame
864 mm² area
Z6 III
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R5 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
Z6 III
Nikon Z
90+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
The verdict
The $1800 price gap between these cameras primarily separates the Canon EOS R5 Mark II's 45-megapixel stacked sensor from the Nikon Z6 III's 24.5-megapixel partially stacked alternative.
Choose the Canon EOS R5 Mark II if you require maximum detail for large-scale prints or professional 8K DCI video production. Its 1053 autofocus points and 30fps electronic burst rate provide superior speed and precision for high-resolution action photography.
Choose the Nikon Z6 III if you prioritize low-light performance and value, as its autofocus system operates down to -10 EV. This model offers a more affordable entry point while still delivering 120fps 4K video and 8 stops of internal stabilization.
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R5 Mark II
Codecs
Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…
AF points / zones
1053 vs 273 — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 101.2, 93.5
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B
Resolution
45 MP vs 24.5 MP — higher is better
Subject recognition
Adds Horses, Motorbikes, Aircraft
IBIS effectiveness
8.5 stops vs 8 stops — higher is better
Weight
746 g vs 760 g — lower is better
Reasons to choose
Z6 III
AF low-light limit
-10 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better
Codecs
Adds N-RAW, ProRes RAW HQ, H.265/HEVC…
Burst (electronic)
120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 101.5, 74
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B / XQD
RAW buffer depth
1000 frames vs 600 frames — higher is better
Subject recognition
Adds Bicycles, Motorcycles, Airplanes
ISO max (native)
64,000 vs 51,200 — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 120 fps
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R5 Mark II
Pros
- ✓45MP stacked CMOS — speed and resolution
- ✓8K 60p RAW internal recording
- ✓30fps electronic burst at full 45MP
- ✓5.76M dot EVF
Cons
- –Premium $4,299 price
- –Short battery life (320 CIPA shots)
- –Body heat in extended 8K sessions
Z6 III
Pros
- ✓Partially stacked CMOS reduces rolling shutter
- ✓6K N-RAW 60p internal — true filmmaking capability
- ✓5.76M dot EVF — best-in-class resolution
- ✓14fps mechanical burst
Cons
- –EN-EL15c battery life only 380 CIPA shots
- –Smaller lens ecosystem vs. Canon RF
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R5 Mark II and Z6 III at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Nikon Z6 III
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, EOS R5 Mark II or Z6 III?
EOS R5 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 7.0/10 for Z6 III — 45MP — excellent for prints up to 24×36".
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and Z6 III?
EOS R5 Mark II is 45 MP and Z6 III is 24.5 MP, so the EOS R5 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R5 Mark II and Z6 III have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R5 Mark II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while z6 III has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 Mark II or the Z6 III?
EOS R5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. Z6 III reaches 120 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and Z6 III?
EOS R5 Mark II weighs 746 g and Z6 III weighs 760 g, so the EOS R5 Mark II is 14 g lighter.
Do the EOS R5 Mark II and Z6 III record 4K video?
EOS R5 Mark II: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. Z6 III: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p.
Are the EOS R5 Mark II and Z6 III weather sealed?
EOS R5 Mark II: Yes. Z6 III: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 Mark II and 380 shots for the Z6 III, giving the Z6 III the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R5 Mark II launched at $4,299 and Z6 III at $2,499. The Z6 III is $1,800 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Nikon press materials.