Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Canon

EOS R5

45MP full-frame hybrid with 8K RAW, 4K 120p, strong AF, and 8-stop in-body stabilization.

$3,899

Released Jul 2020

vs

Canon

EOS RP

Affordable full-frame RF entry with compact body and Dual Pixel AF for enthusiasts stepping up.

$999

Released Feb 2019

EOS R5 is 1.3 years newer.

Wins

11categories

EOS R5

Video & HybridPortrait

Wins

4categories

EOS RP

PortraitTravel

3 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 wins 4 categories·EOS RP wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R5 has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R5 has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R5 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 25 fps)
  • BEOS RP has higher AF points / zones (4779 vs 1053)
  • AEOS R5 has higher Burst (electronic) (20 fps vs 5 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5EOS RP
Resolution45 MP26.2 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,20040,000
Burst20 fps5 fps
4K120 fps25 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight738 g485 g
Battery490 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5

139 × 98 × 88 mm

738 g (1.63 lb / 26.03 oz)

EOS RP

133 × 85 × 70 mm

485 g (1.07 lb / 17.11 oz)

EOS R5 is 6mm wider, 13mm taller, and 18mm thicker than EOS RP.

EOS R5 is 253 g heavier than EOS RP.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R5 · 70mm EOS RP

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

EOS RP

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

EOS RP

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5EOS RP
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
6.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited
Landscape
8.5Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited
Travel
6.0Good
6.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
5.0Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5

  • AF low-light limit

    -6 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 97.5, 88

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 25 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    20 fps vs 5 fps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS RP

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132.5, 85, 70

  • AF points / zones

    4779 vs 1053 — higher is better

  • Weight

    485 g vs 738 g — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 490 shots — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5

Pros

  • 45MP sensor balances resolution and speed
  • 8K RAW and 4K 120p internal video
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with advanced subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • CFexpress Type B plus SD UHS-II storage

Cons

  • Heat limits can matter for extended high-end video
  • Battery life is modest
  • Still expensive versus newer enthusiast bodies

EOS RP

Pros

  • Lowest-cost Canon full-frame RF
  • Compact and light
  • Dual Pixel AF
  • Fully articulating screen

Cons

  • 4K video crop
  • Single card slot
  • No IBIS

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5
EOS RP
Resolution
45 MP+72%
26.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R5
EOS RP
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Dual Pixel CMOS AF
AF points / zones
1053
47794.5× more
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6 EV
-5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
EOS R5
EOS RP
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps2.4× more
5 fps
Burst (electronic)
20 fps4× more
5 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames3× more
60 frames
EOS R5
EOS RP
Max resolution
8K RAW
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
120 fps4.8× more
25 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps17.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Standard profiles
Codecs
RAW, H.265, H.264
H.264
EOS R5
EOS RP
Weight
738 g
485 g−253 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.5 × 97.5 × 88 mm
132.5 × 85 × 70 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R5 or EOS RP?

EOS R5 scores 9.5/10 versus 3.0/10 for EOS RP — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 and EOS RP?

EOS R5 is 45 MP and EOS RP is 26.2 MP, so the EOS R5 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 and EOS RP have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while eOS RP does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 or the EOS RP?

EOS R5 reaches 20 fps electronic. EOS RP reaches 5 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 and EOS RP?

EOS R5 weighs 738 g and EOS RP weighs 485 g, so the EOS RP is 253 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 and EOS RP record 4K video?

EOS R5: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. EOS RP: 4K up to 25p.

Are the EOS R5 and EOS RP weather sealed?

EOS R5: Yes. EOS RP: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 490 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 and 640 shots for the EOS RP, giving the EOS RP the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 launched at $3,899 and EOS RP at $999. The EOS RP is $2,900 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.