Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs
PowerShot SX740 HS

Canon

PowerShot SX740 HS

Pocket travel superzoom with 20.3MP 1/2.3-inch sensor, 40x 24–960mm OIS lens, 4K video, and 180° tilting selfie screen.

$399

Launch price

Released Aug 2018

EOS R6 Mark II is 4.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

1categories

PowerShot SX740 HS

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·PowerShot SX740 HS wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 3,200)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 10 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 265 shots)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIPowerShot SX740 HS
Resolution24.2 MP20.3 MP
SensorFull Frame6.17 × 4.55 mm
ISO max102,4003,200
Burst40 fps10 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight670 g299 g
Battery760 shots265 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PowerShot SX740 HS front view

PowerShot SX740 HS

110 × 64 × 40 mm

299 g (0.66 lb / 10.55 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 28mm wider, 35mm taller, and 49mm thicker than PowerShot SX740 HS.

EOS R6 Mark II is 371 g heavier than PowerShot SX740 HS.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 40mm PowerShot SX740 HS

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PowerShot SX740 HS

110 × 64 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PowerShot SX740 HS

110 × 40 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

PowerShot SX740 HS

6.17 × 4.55 mm · Compact

28 mm² area

30.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

PowerShot SX740 HS: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIPowerShot SX740 HS
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
2.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 3,200 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs 265 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

PowerShot SX740 HS

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264 (MP4)

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 110.1, 63.8, 39.9

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    299 g vs 670 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

PowerShot SX740 HS

Pros

  • 40x 24–960mm optical zoom
  • 4K UHD video
  • 180° tilting LCD for selfies
  • Wi-Fi + Bluetooth
  • 10fps burst with AF lock

Cons

  • Small 1/2.3-inch sensor
  • No built-in EVF
  • Slow telephoto aperture
  • Discontinued (2025)

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot SX740 HS at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
PowerShot SX740 HS
Resolution
24.2 MP+19%
20.3 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
1/2.3-inch CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
6.17 × 4.55 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
PowerShot SX740 HS
Aperture
f/3.3–6.9
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
24–960 mm
EOS R6 Mark II
PowerShot SX740 HS
Processor
DIGIC X
DIGIC 8
EOS R6 Mark II
PowerShot SX740 HS
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+5 stops
3,200
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
EOS R6 Mark II
PowerShot SX740 HS
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark II or PowerShot SX740 HS?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 1.0/10 for PowerShot SX740 HS — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot SX740 HS?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and PowerShot SX740 HS is 20.3 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot SX740 HS have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while PowerShot SX740 HS does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the PowerShot SX740 HS?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. PowerShot SX740 HS reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot SX740 HS?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and PowerShot SX740 HS weighs 299 g, so the PowerShot SX740 HS is 371 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot SX740 HS record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. PowerShot SX740 HS: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot SX740 HS weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. PowerShot SX740 HS: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 265 shots for the PowerShot SX740 HS, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and PowerShot SX740 HS at $399. The PowerShot SX740 HS is $2,100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs PowerShot SX740 HS vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.