
Canon
EOS R7
32.5MP APS-C RF-mount body with 30fps burst, 4K 60p, 7-stop IBIS, and advanced subject tracking.
$1,499
Launch priceReleased May 2022

DJI
Osmo Nano
Ultra-compact modular action camera with 1/1.3-inch sensor, 35MP stills, 4K 60p video, 4K 120fps slow motion, and a Multifunctional Vision Dock.
$299
Launch priceReleased Sep 2025
Osmo Nano is 3.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R7
Wins
Osmo Nano
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R7 has higher AF points / zones (651 vs 0)
- BOsmo Nano has lower Weight (124 g vs 612 g)
- AEOS R7 has higher Burst (mechanical) (15 fps vs 6 fps)
- BOsmo Nano has higher 1080p max frame rate (240 fps vs 100 fps)
- AEOS R7 has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 15 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R7
132 × 90 × 92 mm
612 g (1.35 lb / 21.59 oz)

Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale

Osmo Nano
59 × 72 × 28 mm
124 g (0.27 lb / 4.37 oz)
EOS R7 is 73mm wider, 19mm taller, and 64mm thicker than Osmo Nano.
EOS R7 is 488 g heavier than Osmo Nano.
Depth (front-to-back): 92mm EOS R7 · 28mm Osmo Nano
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R7
132 × 90 mm

Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm

Osmo Nano
59 × 72 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R7
132 × 92 mm

Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Osmo Nano
59 × 28 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R7
22.3 × 14.8 mm · APS-C
330 mm² area
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R7
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
Osmo Nano: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R7
AF points / zones
651 vs 0 — higher is better
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Codecs
Adds H.265, AAC, LPCM
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 132, 90.4, 91.7
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
Burst (mechanical)
15 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better
AA filter
Only EOS R7 supports it
Eye AF
Only EOS R7 supports it
Reasons to choose
Osmo Nano
Codecs
Adds HEVC
Stabilization modes
Adds RockSteady 3.0, HorizonBalancing
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 59.1, 71.7, 28
Card types
Adds microSD
Weight
124 g vs 612 g — lower is better
1080p max frame rate
240 fps vs 100 fps — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
60 frames vs 42 frames — higher is better
Resolution
35 MP vs 32.5 MP — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R7
Pros
- ✓High-resolution 32.5MP APS-C sensor
- ✓Up to 30fps electronic burst
- ✓7-stop in-body stabilization
- ✓Dual SD UHS-II card slots
- ✓Strong value for wildlife and sports reach
Cons
- –APS-C sensor trails full-frame in low-light depth
- –RF-S lens lineup is still limited
- –4K 60p uses a crop in some modes
Osmo Nano
Pros
- ✓52g camera body
- ✓1/1.3-inch sensor
- ✓4K 120fps slow motion
- ✓10m waterproof camera body
Cons
- –Dock is only IPX4
- –Fixed ultra-wide lens
- –Smaller battery in camera body
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R7 and Osmo Nano at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R7
DJI Osmo Nano
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for wildlife, EOS R7 or Osmo Nano?
EOS R7 scores 9.0/10 versus 4.5/10 for Osmo Nano — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R7 and Osmo Nano?
EOS R7 is 32.5 MP and Osmo Nano is 35 MP, so the Osmo Nano captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R7 and Osmo Nano have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R7 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Osmo Nano uses Electronic image stabilization (electronic).
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R7 or the Osmo Nano?
EOS R7 reaches 30 fps electronic. Osmo Nano reaches 15 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R7 and Osmo Nano?
EOS R7 weighs 612 g and Osmo Nano weighs 124 g, so the Osmo Nano is 488 g lighter.
Do the EOS R7 and Osmo Nano record 4K video?
EOS R7: 4K up to 59.94p. Osmo Nano: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R7 and Osmo Nano weather sealed?
EOS R7: Yes. Osmo Nano: Yes.
How much does each cost?
EOS R7 launched at $1,499 and Osmo Nano at $299. The Osmo Nano is $1,200 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R7 vs Osmo Nano vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and DJI press materials.