Canon
EOS R7
32.5MP APS-C RF-mount body with 30fps burst, 4K 60p, 7-stop IBIS, and advanced subject tracking.
$1,499
Launch priceReleased May 2022
Panasonic
Lumix FZ300
Weather-resistant bridge camera with constant f/2.8 25-600mm equivalent Leica zoom and 4K video.
$599
Launch priceReleased Jul 2015
EOS R7 is 6.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R7
Wins
Lumix FZ300
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R7 has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R7 has higher AF points / zones (651 vs 49)
- AEOS R7 has higher ISO max (native) (32,000 vs 6,400)
- AEOS R7 has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 100 Mbps)
- AEOS R7 has higher Resolution (32.5 MP vs 12.1 MP)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R7
132 × 90 × 92 mm
612 g (1.35 lb / 21.59 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
Lumix FZ300
132 × 92 × 117 mm
691 g (1.52 lb / 24.37 oz)
EOS R7 is 1mm shorter and 25mm thinner than Lumix FZ300.
EOS R7 is 79 g lighter than Lumix FZ300.
Depth (front-to-back): 92mm EOS R7 · 117mm Lumix FZ300
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R7
132 × 90 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Lumix FZ300
132 × 92 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R7
132 × 92 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Lumix FZ300
132 × 117 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R7
22.3 × 14.8 mm · APS-C
330 mm² area
Lumix FZ300
6.17 × 4.55 mm · Compact
28 mm² area
11.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R7
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
Lumix FZ300: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R7
AF low-light limit
-5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better
Codecs
Adds H.265, AAC, LPCM
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 132, 90.4, 91.7
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
AF points / zones
651 vs 49 — higher is better
ISO max (native)
32,000 vs 6,400 — higher is better
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps vs 100 Mbps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
Lumix FZ300
Codecs
Adds H.264, MP4, AVCHD
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 131.6, 91.5, 117.1
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Subject recognition
Adds Face, Eye
Burst (electronic)
60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R7
Pros
- ✓High-resolution 32.5MP APS-C sensor
- ✓Up to 30fps electronic burst
- ✓7-stop in-body stabilization
- ✓Dual SD UHS-II card slots
- ✓Strong value for wildlife and sports reach
Cons
- –APS-C sensor trails full-frame in low-light depth
- –RF-S lens lineup is still limited
- –4K 60p uses a crop in some modes
Lumix FZ300
Pros
- ✓Constant f/2.8 24x zoom
- ✓Weather resistant
- ✓4K video
- ✓Great reach
Cons
- –Small 1/2.3-inch sensor
- –12MP
- –Bridge-camera bulk
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R7 and Lumix FZ300 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R7
Panasonic Lumix FZ300
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, EOS R7 or Lumix FZ300?
EOS R7 scores 5.5/10 versus 1.5/10 for Lumix FZ300 — 32.5MP — ample resolution.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R7 and Lumix FZ300?
EOS R7 is 32.5 MP and Lumix FZ300 is 12.1 MP, so the EOS R7 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R7 and Lumix FZ300 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R7 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Lumix FZ300 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R7 or the Lumix FZ300?
EOS R7 reaches 30 fps electronic. Lumix FZ300 reaches 60 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R7 and Lumix FZ300?
EOS R7 weighs 612 g and Lumix FZ300 weighs 691 g, so the EOS R7 is 79 g lighter.
Do the EOS R7 and Lumix FZ300 record 4K video?
EOS R7: 4K up to 59.94p. Lumix FZ300: 4K up to 30p.
Are the EOS R7 and Lumix FZ300 weather sealed?
EOS R7: Yes. Lumix FZ300: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 660 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R7 and 380 shots for the Lumix FZ300, giving the EOS R7 the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R7 launched at $1,499 and Lumix FZ300 at $599. The Lumix FZ300 is $900 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R7 vs Lumix FZ300 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.