Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Z9

Nikon

Z9

Flagship stacked mirrorless with 45MP, 8K video, and no mechanical shutter.

$5,499

Launch price

Released Oct 2021

vs

OM System

OM-D E-M5 Mark II

Compact weather-sealed MFT classic with high-res pixel shift mode.

$1,099

Launch price

Released Feb 2015

Z9 is 6.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

9categories

Z9

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

3categories

OM-D E-M5 Mark II

Sports & ActionWildlife

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Z9 wins 3 categories·OM-D E-M5 Mark II wins 2 categories
  • BOM-D E-M5 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (6 fps vs 0 fps)
  • AZ9 has higher RAW buffer depth (1000 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AZ9 has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AZ9 has higher Resolution (45.7 MP vs 16 MP)
  • BOM-D E-M5 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 493)

Key specs at a glance

Z9OM-D E-M5 Mark II
Resolution45.7 MP16 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst120 fps15 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS6-stop6-stop
Weight1160 g580 g
Battery740 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Z9 front view

Z9

149 × 150 × 91 mm

1160 g (2.56 lb / 40.92 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

OM-D E-M5 Mark II

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

Z9 is 15mm wider, 59mm taller, and 19mm thicker than OM-D E-M5 Mark II.

Z9 is 580 g heavier than OM-D E-M5 Mark II.

Depth (front-to-back): 91mm Z9 · 72mm OM-D E-M5 Mark II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Z9 back view

Z9

149 × 150 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-D E-M5 Mark II

134 × 91 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Z9 top view

Z9

149 × 91 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-D E-M5 Mark II

134 × 72 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Z9

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

OM-D E-M5 Mark II

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Z9

Nikon Z

90+

native lenses available

40 first-party50 third-party

OM-D E-M5 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseZ9OM-D E-M5 Mark II
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
8.5Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
9.5Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited
Travel
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Z9

  • AF low-light limit

    -8.5 EV vs -7 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Dogs…

  • Codecs

    Adds N-RAW, ProRes RAW HQ, ProRes 422 HQ…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 149, 149.5, 90.5

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B / XQD, CFexpress Type B / XQD

  • RAW buffer depth

    1000 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    45.7 MP vs 16 MP — higher is better

Reasons to choose

OM-D E-M5 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Burst (mechanical)

    6 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 91, 72

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 493 — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only OM-D E-M5 Mark II supports it

  • Weight

    580 g vs 1160 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • IBIS effectivenessBoth 6 stops

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Z9

Pros

  • 45MP stacked
  • 8K 60p internal
  • 120fps stills
  • Pro build

Cons

  • Heavy body
  • Expensive
  • Large files

OM-D E-M5 Mark II

Pros

  • Weather sealed
  • Compact
  • Pixel shift hi-res

Cons

  • 16MP base
  • Older AF
  • MFT limits

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Z9 and OM-D E-M5 Mark II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Z9
OM-D E-M5 Mark II
Resolution
45.7 MP2.9× more
16 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
Z9
OM-D E-M5 Mark II
Processor
EXPEED 7
TruePic X
Z9
OM-D E-M5 Mark II
ISO min (native)
64−36 less
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
Z9
OM-D E-M5 Mark II
Shutter type
Electronic only
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
N/A
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, Z9 or OM-D E-M5 Mark II?

Z9 scores 9.5/10 versus 3.5/10 for OM-D E-M5 Mark II — 45.7MP — excellent for prints up to 24×36".

What's the resolution difference between the Z9 and OM-D E-M5 Mark II?

Z9 is 45.7 MP and OM-D E-M5 Mark II is 16 MP, so the Z9 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Z9 and OM-D E-M5 Mark II have in-body image stabilization?

Z9 has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while OM-D E-M5 Mark II has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Z9 or the OM-D E-M5 Mark II?

Z9 reaches 120 fps electronic. OM-D E-M5 Mark II reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Z9 and OM-D E-M5 Mark II?

Z9 weighs 1160 g and OM-D E-M5 Mark II weighs 580 g, so the OM-D E-M5 Mark II is 580 g lighter.

Do the Z9 and OM-D E-M5 Mark II record 4K video?

Z9: 8K UHD (max), 4K up to 120p. OM-D E-M5 Mark II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the Z9 and OM-D E-M5 Mark II weather sealed?

Z9: Yes. OM-D E-M5 Mark II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 740 shots (CIPA) for the Z9 and 640 shots for the OM-D E-M5 Mark II, giving the Z9 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Z9 launched at $5,499 and OM-D E-M5 Mark II at $1,099. The OM-D E-M5 Mark II is $4,400 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Z9 vs OM-D E-M5 Mark II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Nikon and OM System press materials.