Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Panasonic

Lumix G9 II

MFT hybrid with 8-stop IBIS and 75fps stills for wildlife on a budget.

$1,899

Released Sep 2023

vs

Panasonic

Lumix ZS200

Pocket travel zoom with 1-inch sensor and 15x Leica lens for vacations.

$799

Released Feb 2018

Lumix G9 II is 5.6 years newer.

Wins

15categories

Lumix G9 II

Video & HybridSports & Action

Wins

1categories

Lumix ZS200

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

Lumix G9 II wins 5 categories·Lumix ZS200 wins 0 categories
  • ALumix G9 II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • ALumix G9 II has higher AF points / zones (779 vs 49)
  • ALumix G9 II has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 14 frames)
  • ALumix G9 II has higher Max video bit rate (800 Mbps vs 100 Mbps)
  • ALumix G9 II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)

Key specs at a glance

Lumix G9 IILumix ZS200
Resolution25.2 MP20.1 MP
SensorMFT13.2 x 8.8 mm
ISO max25,60012,800
Burst75 fps30 fps
4K120 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight658 g340 g
Battery390 shots370 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Lumix G9 II

134 × 102 × 90 mm

658 g (1.45 lb / 23.21 oz)

Lumix ZS200

111 × 66 × 45 mm

340 g (0.75 lb / 11.99 oz)

Lumix G9 II is 23mm wider, 36mm taller, and 45mm thicker than Lumix ZS200.

Lumix G9 II is 318 g heavier than Lumix ZS200.

Depth (front-to-back): 90mm Lumix G9 II · 45mm Lumix ZS200

Sensor size, to scale

Lumix G9 II

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Lumix ZS200

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

1.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Lumix G9 II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Lumix ZS200: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseLumix G9 IILumix ZS200
Portrait
6.0Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited
Landscape
5.0Fair✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
7.0Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Lumix G9 II

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.3, 102.3, 90.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    779 vs 49 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 14 frames — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    800 Mbps vs 100 Mbps — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, H.265

Reasons to choose

Lumix ZS200

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 111.2, 66.4, 45.2

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Codecs

    Adds MP4, AVCHD

  • Weight

    340 g vs 658 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Lumix G9 II

Pros

  • 75fps stills mode
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Compact tele reach

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Video not GH-level

Lumix ZS200

Pros

  • True pocket size
  • 1-inch sensor
  • 24–360mm zoom

Cons

  • Small sensor vs FF
  • No viewfinder grip
  • Older model

Full specifications

= category winner

Lumix G9 II
Lumix ZS200
Resolution
25.2 MP+25%
20.1 MP
Sensor type
Four Thirds Live MOS
1-inch High Sensitivity MOS
Sensor size
17.3 x 13.0 mm
13.2 x 8.8 mm
AA filter
No
No
Lumix G9 II
Lumix ZS200
AF system
Phase Hybrid AF with DFD technology
Contrast AF with DFD technology
AF points / zones
77915.9× more
49
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-4 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Face, Eye, Animal, Car, Motorcycle
Human, Face, Eye, Animal
Lumix G9 II
Lumix ZS200
Burst (mechanical)
14 fps+40%
10 fps
Burst (electronic)
75 fps2.5× more
30 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
200 frames14.3× more
14 frames
Lumix G9 II
Lumix ZS200
Max resolution
5.8K Open Gate
4K
4K max frame rate
120 fps4× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
800 Mbps8× more
100 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
V-Log / HLG
None
Codecs
Apple ProRes 422 HQ, H.265, H.264
H.264, MP4, AVCHD
Lumix G9 II
Lumix ZS200
Weight
658 g
340 g−318 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
134.3 × 102.3 × 90.1 mm
111.2 × 66.4 × 45.2 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, Lumix G9 II or Lumix ZS200?

Lumix G9 II scores 9.5/10 versus 3.0/10 for Lumix ZS200 — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the Lumix G9 II and Lumix ZS200?

Lumix G9 II is 25.2 MP and Lumix ZS200 is 20.1 MP, so the Lumix G9 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Lumix G9 II and Lumix ZS200 have in-body image stabilization?

Lumix G9 II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while lumix ZS200 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Lumix G9 II or the Lumix ZS200?

Lumix G9 II reaches 75 fps electronic. Lumix ZS200 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Lumix G9 II and Lumix ZS200?

Lumix G9 II weighs 658 g and Lumix ZS200 weighs 340 g, so the Lumix ZS200 is 318 g lighter.

Do the Lumix G9 II and Lumix ZS200 record 4K video?

Lumix G9 II: 5.8K Open Gate (max), 4K up to 120p. Lumix ZS200: 4K up to 30p.

Are the Lumix G9 II and Lumix ZS200 weather sealed?

Lumix G9 II: Yes. Lumix ZS200: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 390 shots (CIPA) for the Lumix G9 II and 370 shots for the Lumix ZS200, giving the Lumix G9 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

Lumix G9 II launched at $1,899 and Lumix ZS200 at $799. The Lumix ZS200 is $1,100 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.