Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R5 Mark II

Canon

EOS R5 Mark II

45MP stacked-sensor powerhouse with 8K 60p RAW internal and 30fps burst.

$4,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs
X-T5

Fujifilm

X-T5

40.2MP APS-C flagship with unrivaled still quality and 20 film simulations.

$1,699

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

EOS R5 Mark II is 1.7 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

EOS R5 Mark II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

5categories

X-T5

WildlifeSports & Action

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 Mark II wins 5 categories·X-T5 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (600 frames vs 72 frames)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 360 Mbps)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 12,800)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 425)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5 Mark IIX-T5
Resolution45 MP40.2 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max51,20012,800
Burst30 fps20 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stop7-stop
Weight746 g557 g
Battery320 shots580 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II front view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 101 × 94 mm

746 g (1.64 lb / 26.31 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

X-T5 front view

X-T5

130 × 91 × 64 mm

557 g (1.23 lb / 19.65 oz)

EOS R5 Mark II is 9mm wider, 10mm taller, and 30mm thicker than X-T5.

EOS R5 Mark II is 189 g heavier than X-T5.

Depth (front-to-back): 94mm EOS R5 Mark II · 64mm X-T5

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 Mark II back view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 101 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

X-T5 back view

X-T5

130 × 91 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 Mark II top view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 94 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

X-T5 top view

X-T5

130 × 64 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

X-T5

23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

369 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

X-T5

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5 Mark IIX-T5
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Landscape
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Travel
5.5Fair
7.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

The verdict

The $2600 price gap centers on the transition from the Fujifilm APS-C sensor to the Canon 45MP Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS sensor.

Choose the Canon EOS R5 Mark II if you require a 600-shot RAW buffer and 30fps electronic burst speeds. Its 8K DCI RAW video and 2600Mbps bitrate provide higher recording specifications than the Fujifilm 6.2K video at 360Mbps.

Choose the Fujifilm X-T5 if you prioritize portability and battery life, as it weighs 557g and offers 580 shots per charge. It provides a 40.2MP sensor and 7 stops of IBIS at a lower price point.

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 101.2, 93.5

  • RAW buffer depth

    600 frames vs 72 frames — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 360 Mbps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 425 — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R5 Mark II supports it

Reasons to choose

X-T5

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 129.5, 91, 63.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I, SDXC V90

  • AF low-light limit

    -7 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    580 shots vs 320 shots — higher is better

  • Weight

    557 g vs 746 g — lower is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    15 fps vs 12 fps — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.8 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5 Mark II

Pros

  • 45MP stacked CMOS — speed and resolution
  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • 30fps electronic burst at full 45MP
  • 5.76M dot EVF

Cons

  • Premium $4,299 price
  • Short battery life (320 CIPA shots)
  • Body heat in extended 8K sessions

X-T5

Pros

  • 40.2MP APS-C — rivals full-frame for detail
  • Compact retro body (557g)
  • 7-stop IBIS in a small body
  • 20 film simulations including Velvia, Provia

Cons

  • 4K 60p has a 1.29× crop
  • 3-way tilt LCD — no full articulation
  • APS-C crop factor (1.5×) for full-frame lenses

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R5 Mark II and X-T5 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5 Mark II
X-T5
Resolution
45 MP+12%
40.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 5 HR
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
23.5 x 15.7 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R5 Mark II
X-T5
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
X-Processor 5
EOS R5 Mark II
X-T5
ISO min (native)
100−25 less
125
ISO max (native)
51,200+2 stops
12,800
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
51,200
EOS R5 Mark II
X-T5
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Focal Plane Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/180000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R5 Mark II or X-T5?

EOS R5 Mark II scores 9.5/10 versus 5.5/10 for X-T5 — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and X-T5?

EOS R5 Mark II is 45 MP and X-T5 is 40.2 MP, so the EOS R5 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and X-T5 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 Mark II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while X-T5 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 Mark II or the X-T5?

EOS R5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. X-T5 reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and X-T5?

EOS R5 Mark II weighs 746 g and X-T5 weighs 557 g, so the X-T5 is 189 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and X-T5 record 4K video?

EOS R5 Mark II: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. X-T5: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R5 Mark II and X-T5 weather sealed?

EOS R5 Mark II: Yes. X-T5: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 Mark II and 580 shots for the X-T5, giving the X-T5 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 Mark II launched at $4,299 and X-T5 at $1,699. The X-T5 is $2,600 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R5 Mark II vs X-T5 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.