Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R5 C

Canon

EOS R5 C

Cinema-focused 45MP full-frame hybrid with active cooling, 8K RAW 60p, and Canon Cinema EOS video tools.

$4,499

Launch price

Released Jan 2022

vs
EOS R5 Mark II

Canon

EOS R5 Mark II

45MP stacked-sensor powerhouse with 8K 60p RAW internal and 30fps burst.

$4,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

EOS R5 Mark II is 2.4 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

1categories

EOS R5 C

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

7categories

EOS R5 Mark II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

10 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 C wins 0 categories·EOS R5 Mark II wins 5 categories
  • BEOS R5 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BEOS R5 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (600 frames vs 83 frames)
  • BEOS R5 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 1360 Mbps)
  • BEOS R5 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 20 fps)
  • BEOS R5 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (320 shots vs 220 shots)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5 CEOS R5 Mark II
Resolution45 MP45 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,20051,200
Burst20 fps30 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBISNo8.5-stop
Weight770 g746 g
Battery220 shots320 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 C front view

EOS R5 C

142 × 102 × 112 mm

770 g (1.70 lb / 27.16 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

EOS R5 Mark II front view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 101 × 94 mm

746 g (1.64 lb / 26.31 oz)

EOS R5 C is 4mm wider and 18mm thicker than EOS R5 Mark II.

EOS R5 C is 24 g heavier than EOS R5 Mark II.

Depth (front-to-back): 112mm EOS R5 C · 94mm EOS R5 Mark II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 C back view

EOS R5 C

142 × 102 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R5 Mark II back view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 101 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 C top view

EOS R5 C

142 × 112 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R5 Mark II top view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 94 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5 C

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

EOS R5 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5 C

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

EOS R5 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5 CEOS R5 Mark II
Portrait
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Travel
2.5Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins
Wildlife
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
4.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5 C

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird

  • Codecs

    Adds Cinema RAW Light, AVC-LongG, MP4…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 142.2, 101.6, 111.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)

  • EVF resolution

    5,790,000 vs 5,760,000 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R5 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 101.2, 93.5

  • RAW buffer depth

    600 frames vs 83 frames — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R5 Mark II supports it

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS R5 Mark II supports it

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 45 MP
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 51,200
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5 C

Pros

  • 8K RAW 60p internal recording with active cooling
  • Cinema EOS interface and professional video tools
  • 45MP full-frame stills capability
  • 4K 120p slow motion
  • CFexpress Type B plus SD UHS-II storage

Cons

  • No in-body stabilization
  • Battery life is limited for high-end video
  • Larger body than the EOS R5

EOS R5 Mark II

Pros

  • 45MP stacked CMOS — speed and resolution
  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • 30fps electronic burst at full 45MP
  • 5.76M dot EVF

Cons

  • Premium $4,299 price
  • Short battery life (320 CIPA shots)
  • Body heat in extended 8K sessions

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R5 C and EOS R5 Mark II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5 C
EOS R5 Mark II
Resolution
45 MP
45 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
36.0 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
EOS R5 C
EOS R5 Mark II
Processor
DIGIC X
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
EOS R5 C
EOS R5 Mark II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
EOS R5 C
EOS R5 Mark II
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R5 C or EOS R5 Mark II?

EOS R5 Mark II scores 9.5/10 versus 5.5/10 for EOS R5 C — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 C and EOS R5 Mark II?

Both cameras share the same 45 MP resolution.

Do the EOS R5 C and EOS R5 Mark II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 C does not have IBIS, while EOS R5 Mark II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 C or the EOS R5 Mark II?

EOS R5 C reaches 20 fps electronic. EOS R5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 C and EOS R5 Mark II?

EOS R5 C weighs 770 g and EOS R5 Mark II weighs 746 g, so the EOS R5 Mark II is 24 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 C and EOS R5 Mark II record 4K video?

EOS R5 C: 4K up to 120p. EOS R5 Mark II: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R5 C and EOS R5 Mark II weather sealed?

EOS R5 C: Yes. EOS R5 Mark II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 220 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 C and 320 shots for the EOS R5 Mark II, giving the EOS R5 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 C launched at $4,499 and EOS R5 Mark II at $4,299. The EOS R5 Mark II is $200 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R5 C vs EOS R5 Mark II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.