Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R5 Mark II

Canon

EOS R5 Mark II

45MP stacked-sensor powerhouse with 8K 60p RAW internal and 30fps burst.

$4,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs
EOS R7

Canon

EOS R7

32.5MP APS-C RF-mount body with 30fps burst, 4K 60p, 7-stop IBIS, and advanced subject tracking.

$1,499

Launch price

Released May 2022

EOS R5 Mark II is 2.1 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

9categories

EOS R5 Mark II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

4categories

EOS R7

WildlifeSports & Action

5 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 Mark II wins 4 categories·EOS R7 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (600 frames vs 42 frames)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 340 Mbps)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • BEOS R7 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (660 shots vs 320 shots)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 59.94 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5 Mark IIEOS R7
Resolution45 MP32.5 MP
SensorFull Frame22.3 x 14.8
ISO max51,20032,000
Burst30 fps30 fps
4K120 fps59.94 fps
IBIS8.5-stop8-stop
Weight746 g612 g
Battery320 shots660 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II front view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 101 × 94 mm

746 g (1.64 lb / 26.31 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

EOS R7 front view

EOS R7

132 × 90 × 92 mm

612 g (1.35 lb / 21.59 oz)

EOS R5 Mark II is 7mm wider, 11mm taller, and 2mm thicker than EOS R7.

EOS R5 Mark II is 134 g heavier than EOS R7.

Depth (front-to-back): 94mm EOS R5 Mark II · 92mm EOS R7

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 Mark II back view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 101 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R7 back view

EOS R7

132 × 90 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 Mark II top view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 94 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R7 top view

EOS R7

132 × 92 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

EOS R7

22.3 × 14.8 mm · APS-C

330 mm² area

2.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

EOS R7

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5 Mark IIEOS R7
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
8.5Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Travel
5.5Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
6.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 101.2, 93.5

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    600 frames vs 42 frames — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R7

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132, 90.4, 91.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Codecs

    Adds AAC, LPCM

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    660 shots vs 320 shots — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    1.15 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    15 fps vs 12 fps — higher is better

  • Weight

    612 g vs 746 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (electronic)Both 30 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5 Mark II

Pros

  • 45MP stacked CMOS — speed and resolution
  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • 30fps electronic burst at full 45MP
  • 5.76M dot EVF

Cons

  • Premium $4,299 price
  • Short battery life (320 CIPA shots)
  • Body heat in extended 8K sessions

EOS R7

Pros

  • High-resolution 32.5MP APS-C sensor
  • Up to 30fps electronic burst
  • 7-stop in-body stabilization
  • Dual SD UHS-II card slots
  • Strong value for wildlife and sports reach

Cons

  • APS-C sensor trails full-frame in low-light depth
  • RF-S lens lineup is still limited
  • 4K 60p uses a crop in some modes

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R7 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R7
Resolution
45 MP+38%
32.5 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
22.3 x 14.8
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R7
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
DIGIC X
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R7
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200+0.7 stops
32,000
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
51,200
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R7
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R5 Mark II or EOS R7?

EOS R5 Mark II scores 9.5/10 versus 3.5/10 for EOS R7 — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R7?

EOS R5 Mark II is 45 MP and EOS R7 is 32.5 MP, so the EOS R5 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R7 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 Mark II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while EOS R7 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 Mark II or the EOS R7?

EOS R5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. EOS R7 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R7?

EOS R5 Mark II weighs 746 g and EOS R7 weighs 612 g, so the EOS R7 is 134 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R7 record 4K video?

EOS R5 Mark II: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. EOS R7: 4K up to 59.94p.

Are the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R7 weather sealed?

EOS R5 Mark II: Yes. EOS R7: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 Mark II and 660 shots for the EOS R7, giving the EOS R7 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 Mark II launched at $4,299 and EOS R7 at $1,499. The EOS R7 is $2,800 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R5 Mark II vs EOS R7 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.