Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R5 Mark II

Canon

EOS R5 Mark II

45MP stacked-sensor powerhouse with 8K 60p RAW internal and 30fps burst.

$4,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs
Z9

Nikon

Z9

Flagship stacked mirrorless with 45MP, 8K video, and no mechanical shutter.

$5,499

Launch price

Released Oct 2021

EOS R5 Mark II is 2.7 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

EOS R5 Mark II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

7categories

Z9

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 Mark II wins 3 categories·Z9 wins 2 categories
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 0 fps)
  • BZ9 has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • BZ9 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (740 shots vs 320 shots)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 493)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5 Mark IIZ9
Resolution45 MP45.7 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,20025,600
Burst30 fps120 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8.5-stop6-stop
Weight746 g1160 g
Battery320 shots740 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II front view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 101 × 94 mm

746 g (1.64 lb / 26.31 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Z9 front view

Z9

149 × 150 × 91 mm

1160 g (2.56 lb / 40.92 oz)

EOS R5 Mark II is 11mm narrower and 48mm shorter than Z9 but it is also 3mm thicker.

EOS R5 Mark II is 414 g lighter than Z9.

Depth (front-to-back): 94mm EOS R5 Mark II · 91mm Z9

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 Mark II back view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 101 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Z9 back view

Z9

149 × 150 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 Mark II top view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 94 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Z9 top view

Z9

149 × 91 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Z9

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Z9

Nikon Z

90+

native lenses available

40 first-party50 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5 Mark IIZ9
Portrait
8.5Excellent
8.5Excellent
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent
9.5Excellent
Landscape
8.5Excellent
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5 Mark II

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 101.2, 93.5

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 493 — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R5 Mark II supports it

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Z9

  • AF low-light limit

    -8.5 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds N-RAW, ProRes RAW HQ, ProRes 422 HQ…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 149, 149.5, 90.5

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B / XQD, CFexpress Type B / XQD

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    740 shots vs 320 shots — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    1000 frames vs 600 frames — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    64 vs 100 — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 120 fps
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5 Mark II

Pros

  • 45MP stacked CMOS — speed and resolution
  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • 30fps electronic burst at full 45MP
  • 5.76M dot EVF

Cons

  • Premium $4,299 price
  • Short battery life (320 CIPA shots)
  • Body heat in extended 8K sessions

Z9

Pros

  • 45MP stacked
  • 8K 60p internal
  • 120fps stills
  • Pro build

Cons

  • Heavy body
  • Expensive
  • Large files

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R5 Mark II and Z9 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5 Mark II
Z9
Resolution
45 MP
45.7 MP+2%
Sensor type
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R5 Mark II
Z9
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
EXPEED 7
EOS R5 Mark II
Z9
ISO min (native)
100
64−36 less
ISO max (native)
51,200+1 stop
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
EOS R5 Mark II
Z9
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Electronic only
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
N/A
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R5 Mark II or Z9?

Z9 scores 9.5/10 versus 8.5/10 for EOS R5 Mark II — 45.7MP — excellent for prints up to 24×36".

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and Z9?

EOS R5 Mark II is 45 MP and Z9 is 45.7 MP, so the Z9 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and Z9 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 Mark II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Z9 has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 Mark II or the Z9?

EOS R5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. Z9 reaches 120 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and Z9?

EOS R5 Mark II weighs 746 g and Z9 weighs 1160 g, so the EOS R5 Mark II is 414 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and Z9 record 4K video?

EOS R5 Mark II: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. Z9: 8K UHD (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R5 Mark II and Z9 weather sealed?

EOS R5 Mark II: Yes. Z9: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 Mark II and 740 shots for the Z9, giving the Z9 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 Mark II launched at $4,299 and Z9 at $5,499. The EOS R5 Mark II is $1,200 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R5 Mark II vs Z9 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Nikon press materials.